This in-depth report, updated January 18, 2026, scrutinizes Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD.UN) through five critical lenses, from its business model to its fair value. We benchmark AD.UN against key peers like Ares Capital Corporation and Main Street Capital, providing actionable takeaways inspired by the investment philosophies of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD.UN)

The outlook for Alaris Equity Partners is Mixed. The company provides unique financing to private businesses for steady cash distributions. Its key strength is a permanent capital base, allowing for patient, long-term investments. However, the portfolio is highly concentrated, making returns vulnerable to a single partner's failure. Finances are a concern, as volatile cash flow has not consistently covered its dividend. The stock appears undervalued, trading at a discount to its net asset value. Alaris suits investors with a high risk tolerance, but its dividend sustainability is a major risk.

CAN: TSX

56%

Current Price

52 Week Range

Market Cap

EPS (Diluted TTM)

P/E Ratio

Forward P/E

Avg Volume (3M)

Day Volume

Total Revenue (TTM)

Net Income (TTM)

Annual Dividend

Dividend Yield

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

2/5

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust has a distinct business model within the specialty finance sector. In simple terms, Alaris acts as a capital provider to established, profitable, private companies. Instead of buying the company outright or providing a traditional loan with strict repayment terms, Alaris invests capital in exchange for a preferred equity stake. This means they receive a pre-determined, monthly cash distribution from the partner company's profits, similar to receiving rent or a dividend. Crucially, Alaris does not take a controlling interest, allowing the original owners and management to continue running their business without interference. This non-control approach is a key differentiator and attracts business owners who need capital for growth, succession planning, or shareholder liquidity but are unwilling to sell their company or cede control. The company's revenues are almost entirely derived from the sum of these monthly distributions from its portfolio of partner companies across various industries in North America.

The core and sole product offering of Alaris is its 'Preferred Equity Financing' solution, which accounts for over 95% of its revenue stream. This financial instrument is a hybrid, sitting between traditional debt and common equity. For the partner company, it provides long-term capital without the rigid covenants and maturity dates of bank debt, or the ownership dilution of selling common stock to a private equity firm. Alaris's return is primarily the monthly cash 'yield,' which is contractually set. The total addressable market for this service is vast, encompassing the multi-trillion dollar private small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) market in North America. This market is highly fragmented, with competition from a wide array of capital providers. Profit margins for Alaris can be high when its partners are healthy and paying their distributions as agreed. However, the risk is also significant, as an investment can be completely written off if a partner company fails, and Alaris's subordinate position in the capital structure means it may recover little in a bankruptcy scenario.

When compared to its competitors, Alaris's model stands out. Traditional banks are the most common source of SME financing, but they typically require personal guarantees, impose strict operating rules (covenants), and focus on asset-backed lending. Private credit funds offer more flexible capital but often at higher interest rates and may demand more control or influence over the business. Traditional private equity firms, such as Onex or Brookfield's private equity arms, focus on acquiring a controlling stake to actively manage and grow the business before selling it. Alaris's approach is fundamentally different. It underwrites the management team and the durability of the company's cash flows, acting as a passive financial partner. Its model is most similar to some Business Development Companies (BDCs) in the U.S., like Main Street Capital (MAIN), which also makes equity-like investments, but Alaris's strict focus on non-control, preferred-only stakes remains a niche.

The 'customer' for Alaris is the owner of a successful private business with a history of stable cash flow, typically generating between $5 million and $30 million in annual EBITDA. These entrepreneurs are often facing a transition point—perhaps they want to buy out a partner, fund a major expansion, or diversify their personal wealth without selling the business they built. The relationship is inherently sticky; the bespoke nature of the financing agreements makes them difficult and costly to refinance. Therefore, once a company partners with Alaris, it is usually for the long term, creating a durable relationship. The amount of capital provided can range from $10 million to over $100 million per partner, representing a significant financial commitment for both sides. This deep, long-term partnership model fosters alignment and reduces customer turnover, which is a key strength.

The competitive moat for this financing product is built on three pillars: a specialized underwriting process, a strong brand reputation, and a permanent capital structure. Alaris has developed deep expertise in evaluating the long-term cash flow stability of private, mid-market companies, a skill set not easily replicated. Its reputation as a founder-friendly, non-intrusive partner is a powerful marketing tool that attracts the specific type of business owner it seeks to partner with. Finally, and most importantly, its public trust structure provides permanent capital. Unlike PE funds that must exit investments within a decade, Alaris can remain invested indefinitely, allowing it to be a truly patient partner. However, this moat is vulnerable. Its underwriting skill has been tested, with several partner companies failing or requiring renegotiated terms in the past, leading to significant impairments. Furthermore, its success is wholly dependent on the health of the North American economy and the operational execution of a relatively small number of partner companies.

Ultimately, Alaris's business model is a high-conviction strategy that trades broad diversification for deeper, more customized partnerships. The permanent capital base provides a foundational advantage, giving it the stability to pursue its unique investment strategy through economic cycles. This structure is ideal for its chosen niche of providing long-term, passive capital, an area underserved by traditional financiers. The alignment with unitholders is also strong due to an internal management structure, which avoids the hefty fees common in the asset management industry.

However, the durability of this model is challenged by its inherent concentration risk. With a portfolio of typically fewer than 30 companies, the underperformance of just one or two major partners can have an outsized negative impact on Alaris's total revenue and stock price. The moat, therefore, rests precariously on the underwriting team's ability to consistently select resilient businesses. While the model is structurally sound and occupies an attractive niche, its resilience over time is not guaranteed and has been proven fallible during periods of economic stress or due to specific underwriting errors. The business is strong in concept but fragile in execution, requiring a high degree of confidence in management's risk assessment capabilities.

Financial Statement Analysis

2/5

From a quick health check, Alaris's financial position raises several concerns. While the company is profitable on a trailing-twelve-month basis with a net income of $169M, its quarterly performance is extremely volatile, swinging from a net loss of -$17.9M in Q2 2025 to a net profit of $86M in Q3 2025. More importantly, it is not consistently generating real cash; operating cash flow was a negative -$69.16M in Q2 before recovering to $19.2M in Q3. The balance sheet is on a watchlist due to poor liquidity, with current assets of $8.15M covering only a fraction of current liabilities ($24.85M). Near-term stress is clearly visible in the doubling of total debt to $152M since year-end, which was necessary to cover cash shortfalls.

The income statement reveals that profitability is inconsistent and of low quality. For the full year 2024, Alaris reported revenue of $155M and net income of $234.4M, but this was heavily inflated by an $80.8M currency gain and a $30.3M gain on asset sales. This trend continued in recent quarters, where a -$44.8M currency loss drove the Q2 net loss, while an $18.5M currency gain boosted the Q3 profit. While operating margins appear exceptionally high at over 83%, this figure is misleading because the revenue it's based on is filled with these volatile, non-cash items. For investors, this means that reported earnings are not a reliable indicator of the company's core operational health or its ability to generate predictable profits.

A crucial quality check shows that Alaris's impressive earnings are not 'real' in terms of cash generation. There is a significant and persistent mismatch between net income and cash flow from operations (CFO). In fiscal year 2024, net income was $234.4M, while CFO was only $59.4M. Similarly, in Q3 2025, net income was $86M, yet CFO was just $19.2M. This gap is primarily due to large non-cash gains included in net income that do not represent actual money coming into the business. Free cash flow, the cash left after operational expenses, is also highly erratic, swinging from a deeply negative -$69.16M in Q2 to a positive $19.2M in Q3. This demonstrates that the company's accounting profits do not reliably translate into the cash needed to run the business and pay dividends.

The company's balance sheet resilience has weakened and is now a key area to watch. Liquidity is very poor, with only $5.99M in cash and a current ratio of just 0.33 as of the latest quarter, meaning it has only 33 cents of current assets for every dollar of near-term liabilities. The most significant concern is the rapid increase in leverage; total debt has ballooned from $64.6M at the end of 2024 to $152M in Q3 2025. While the debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13 still appears low, the trend of accumulating debt to fund operations is not sustainable. The balance sheet should be considered on a watchlist due to the combination of poor liquidity and rapidly rising debt.

Alaris's cash flow 'engine' appears unreliable and prone to sputtering. The trend in cash from operations is highly unpredictable, making it difficult to depend on for funding the company's needs. Free cash flow was almost entirely consumed by dividends in fiscal 2024 ($59.4M FCF vs. $61.9M dividends) and turned massively negative in Q2 2025, forcing the company to issue $87.8M in debt to cover the shortfall. In Q3, the company used its positive free cash flow of $19.2M to fund $15.5M in dividends and $2.25M in share buybacks. This pattern shows that when cash generation is weak, the company turns to debt to fund its shareholder payouts, a risky strategy that cannot continue indefinitely.

Looking at shareholder payouts, the company's dividend appears to be on shaky ground. Alaris pays a significant quarterly dividend, which it recently increased. However, its affordability is highly questionable. As noted, free cash flow did not fully cover the dividend in FY2024 and was massively insufficient in Q2 2025, when the payout was funded by new debt. While coverage was adequate in the most recent quarter, this inconsistency is a major red flag for income-focused investors. At the same time, the company has been buying back shares, reducing its share count from 45.62M to 45.34M over the year. Using cash for buybacks when the dividend is not consistently covered by internal cash flow is an aggressive choice that adds to the financial risk.

In summary, Alaris's financial statements present several key strengths and significant red flags. The primary strengths are its low overall leverage, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13, and what appears to be a low-cost operating structure. However, these are overshadowed by serious risks. The key red flags are: 1) extremely volatile and unreliable operating cash flow, which was negative -$69.16M in Q2 2025; 2) poor quality earnings that depend heavily on non-cash items like currency gains; and 3) a rapid increase in debt to $152M used to cover cash shortfalls and shareholder payouts. Overall, the financial foundation looks risky because the company is not consistently generating enough cash to support its dividend, forcing it to rely on debt.

Past Performance

3/5

When looking at Alaris's performance over time, a pattern of volatility becomes clear. The five-year average (FY2020-FY2024) revenue growth is positive, but this masks wild year-to-year swings. For instance, revenue soared in FY2021 and FY2023 but fell sharply in other years. A more telling metric, Earnings Per Share (EPS), shows a similar pattern of inconsistency, though the average over the last three years ($3.70) is higher than the five-year average ($2.99), suggesting profitability has improved. The most recent fiscal year, FY2024, exemplifies this unpredictability: revenue declined by 35.76%, yet EPS jumped 73.38% to $5.15. This disconnect was driven by non-operating items like currency gains and asset sales, highlighting that headline earnings are not always a reflection of core operational performance.

The income statement reveals a business model that produces lumpy results. Revenue is inherently unpredictable, as it depends on distributions from partner companies and the timing of investment exits. While this can lead to massive gains in some years, it also creates periods of decline, making it difficult to project a stable growth trajectory. Profitability metrics like operating margin have been very high, often exceeding 80%, but net profit margin is extremely volatile, ranging from 29.8% in 2020 to 151.25% in 2024. This is due to the significant impact of gains on investments, currency fluctuations, and taxes, which can distort the underlying health of the business. The quality of Alaris's earnings is therefore low, as it is not derived from stable, recurring operations.

An analysis of the balance sheet shows a significant improvement in financial stability. Total debt, which stood at $403 million in FY2023, was drastically reduced to just $65 million in FY2024. This caused the debt-to-equity ratio to fall from 0.42 to a very conservative 0.06, substantially de-risking the company from a leverage standpoint. This is a major positive for long-term stability. However, liquidity has become a point of concern. The company's working capital has been negative for the past two years, and its current ratio fell to 0.46 in FY2024, suggesting potential pressure on its ability to meet short-term obligations. While the debt reduction is a clear strength, the weakening liquidity position is a risk that investors should monitor.

The company's cash flow performance tells a story of reliability mixed with recent weakness. Alaris has consistently generated positive operating cash flow over the last five years, a crucial sign of a healthy underlying business. However, the trend is concerning, with free cash flow declining from a peak of $152 million in FY2022 to just $59 million in FY2024. A key insight is the frequent disconnect between net income and free cash flow. In FY2024, reported net income was $234 million, but free cash flow was only $59 million. This gap occurs because net income included large non-cash gains, reinforcing the idea that cash flow is a more reliable measure of performance than reported earnings for this type of company.

From a shareholder returns perspective, Alaris has focused on providing a steady dividend. The company has consistently paid dividends, and the dividend per share has gradually increased from $1.28 in FY2021 to $1.36 in FY2024. This demonstrates a strong commitment to returning capital to shareholders. However, this has been accompanied by an increase in the number of shares outstanding over the five-year period. The share count rose from 39 million in FY2020 to 45 million by FY2024, primarily due to a large issuance in 2021. This means that existing shareholders' ownership has been diluted over time. A positive recent development was a small reduction in the share count in FY2024.

Connecting these actions to performance, the dilution from issuing new shares was followed by periods of very high earnings, suggesting the capital was used productively, even if it spread profits across more shares. While EPS growth has been strong enough to overcome the dilution, free cash flow per share has declined in the last two years from $3.06 in 2022 to $1.29 in 2024. The dividend's affordability, a key question for income investors, appears sustainable but requires monitoring. In FY2024, free cash flow of $59 million barely covered the $62 million paid in dividends. While past years showed much stronger coverage, the recent trend and the tight coverage in the latest year are a risk. The significant debt reduction in FY2024 provides a critical buffer, making the dividend safer than it would otherwise be.

Overall, Alaris's historical record does not support confidence in steady, predictable execution. Instead, it shows a company that operates in a cyclical, high-risk, high-reward environment. Its performance has been choppy, characterized by bursts of high profitability followed by periods of contraction. The single biggest historical strength has been the company's ability to generate high returns on its investments and translate that into a reliable and growing dividend for shareholders. Its most significant weakness is the inherent volatility and low quality of its earnings, making the business difficult to analyze and its future performance hard to predict. The historical record suggests a resilient business but one that is not suitable for investors who prioritize stability.

Future Growth

3/5

The specialty capital industry, particularly the private credit and non-control equity space where Alaris operates, is undergoing significant change. Over the next 3-5 years, this market is expected to continue its rapid expansion, with total assets under management projected to grow at a CAGR of over 10%, potentially exceeding $2.5 trillion globally. This growth is driven by several factors: traditional banks are retreating from mid-market lending due to stricter capital regulations, creating a funding gap; institutional investors are increasing allocations to private markets in search of higher yields; and private companies are staying private longer, increasing their need for flexible, long-term capital. A key catalyst for demand is the current higher interest rate environment, which makes traditional floating-rate debt less attractive for borrowers compared to the fixed-rate preferred equity Alaris offers.

However, this growth has also dramatically increased competitive intensity. Large, global asset managers have entered the private credit space, raising massive funds that can offer more competitive terms. This makes it harder for smaller players like Alaris to source high-quality deals without compressing their target returns. While the barriers to entry in terms of capital are high, the number of firms competing for deals in the >$10 million EBITDA range has increased significantly. The key to success in the next 3-5 years will be underwriting discipline and the ability to offer a differentiated product. For Alaris, its non-control, patient capital approach remains a key differentiator that appeals to a specific niche of business owners who prioritize autonomy over the cost of capital.

Alaris's sole product is its preferred equity financing solution. Current consumption is driven by a niche segment of the private SME market: established, profitable businesses whose owners require capital for succession planning, management buyouts, or growth but refuse to sell control. Consumption is currently limited by the bespoke and complex nature of these deals, a lengthy underwriting process, and business owners' general reluctance to part with any form of equity. Furthermore, the high distribution rates, often in the 13-15% range, can be a significant cash flow burden, limiting the pool of companies that can sustainably afford this type of financing. The primary constraint is the small size of Alaris's own origination team, which limits the number of deals it can evaluate and close annually.

Over the next 3-5 years, the consumption of Alaris's financing is expected to increase among founder-led businesses in non-cyclical sectors like healthcare, business services, and essential consumer goods. These owners are likely to be more cautious about taking on floating-rate bank debt in a volatile economic environment, making Alaris's fixed-payment structure more appealing. A potential catalyst for accelerated growth would be a wave of retiring baby-boomer entrepreneurs seeking to partially cash out without selling the family business to a competitor or private equity firm. However, consumption may decrease from more cyclical sectors like consumer discretionary or construction if an economic downturn materializes, as these companies will struggle to meet the high distribution payments. The market for this type of capital remains a small fraction of the overall SME financing market but is poised for steady, albeit lumpy, growth.

When choosing a capital provider, business owners weigh control, cost, and complexity. Alaris's key competitor set includes traditional private equity firms, Business Development Companies (BDCs), and private credit funds. Customers choose traditional PE when they are ready to sell a majority stake and want an operationally involved partner. They choose private credit funds or BDCs for straightforward debt financing, often at a lower cost but with stricter covenants and repayment schedules. Alaris outperforms and wins deals when the primary decision driver for the owner is maintaining control and operational independence. Alaris's ability to offer patient, long-term (often perpetual) capital is a key advantage. However, if a company is purely focused on the lowest cost of capital, a private credit fund will likely win. If the owner is looking for a strategic partner to help run the business, a traditional PE firm will win.

This niche of non-control specialty capital providers has seen a modest increase in the number of firms, but it remains less crowded than the mainstream private credit market. The number of companies is likely to increase slowly over the next five years. The primary barrier to entry is not capital but underwriting expertise and reputation. It takes years to build a track record and a brand as a founder-friendly partner, which deters many new entrants who opt for more scalable credit strategies. The economics are driven by scale and underwriting success; a few bad deals can cripple a smaller firm. Therefore, while more capital is flowing into private markets, the number of direct, specialized competitors to Alaris will likely remain limited. The key risk for Alaris is less about new firms entering and more about large, established private credit players adding a similar product to their existing platforms.

Looking ahead, Alaris's growth is fundamentally tied to the health of the North American SME ecosystem and its own underwriting acumen. A plausible, high-probability risk is a significant underwriting error on a new, large deployment within the next 3 years. Given its concentrated portfolio and history of impairments, a new partner failing could immediately erase 5-10% of its revenue stream and trigger a dividend cut. Another plausible risk is a mild recession (medium probability), which would likely not cause widespread defaults but could lead to 2-3 partners needing to temporarily defer distributions, creating a drag on earnings and investor sentiment. A third risk is long-term yield compression (medium probability). As more capital floods private markets, the 14-15% yields Alaris currently enjoys may become unsustainable, and new deployments may need to be made at 12-13%, which would slow future per-unit earnings growth.

Fair Value

4/5

As of January 16, 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust trades at C$21.60, near the top of its 52-week range and with a market capitalization of C$979 million. For a specialty capital provider, the most important valuation metrics are its Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 0.86, normalized Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 6.87, and a forward dividend yield of 6.85%. The sub-1.0 P/B ratio is particularly notable, suggesting the stock trades for less than the stated value of its net assets. This market discount is largely attributed to the company's history of volatile earnings and cash flows, stemming from a concentrated portfolio of private investments.

Valuation analysis presents a conflicted picture. On one hand, market analysts are bullish, with a median 12-month price target of C$24.75, implying 14.6% upside. Similarly, valuation based on multiples is highly favorable. The stock's P/E and P/B ratios are significantly below its own 10-year historical averages and also represent a substantial discount to comparable specialty finance peers. These asset- and multiples-based views suggest a fair value in the C$25.00–C$27.00 range. On the other hand, valuation methods based on cash flow are far more cautious. A discounted cash flow (DCF) model is difficult to apply due to negative recent free cash flow (FCF), but a simplified model using normalized FCF yields a fair value of C$18–C$23. An even more critical yield-based analysis, which demands a higher return to compensate for risk, suggests the stock is overvalued, with a fair value range of just C$14.50–C$18.70.

Synthesizing these conflicting signals, the most reliable valuation methods for Alaris are those anchored to its assets (P/B ratio) and relative multiples, as its cash flows are too erratic to serve as a stable foundation for valuation. The caution signaled by the cash-flow models highlights the key risk for investors, but it doesn't invalidate the deep discount apparent in the asset-based metrics. By blending the more reliable analyst and multiples-based ranges, while acknowledging the risks, a final fair value range of C$23.00–C$26.00 is established. Compared to the current price of C$21.60, this suggests the stock is fundamentally undervalued, with a potential upside of over 13%. The primary driver of future value will be the market's confidence in Alaris's portfolio, as reflected in its P/B multiple.

Future Risks

Alaris's success is closely tied to the health of its private company partners, making it vulnerable to economic downturns that could disrupt their cash flow and payments. Persistently high interest rates pose a dual threat by increasing Alaris's own borrowing costs and potentially weakening its partners. Given its reliance on a concentrated portfolio of companies, underperformance from just a few key partners could jeopardize its revenue stream. Investors should closely watch the dividend payout ratio and the financial stability of its largest investments.

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett would approach a specialty capital provider like Alaris with extreme caution, prioritizing understandable businesses with predictable long-term cash flows and a durable competitive moat. He would find Alaris's model, which relies on preferred equity distributions from a concentrated portfolio of around 20 private companies, to be inherently less predictable than a railroad or a consumer brand. The company's history of investment write-downs and a dividend cut in 2020 would be significant red flags, clashing with his requirement for consistent, reliable earnings power. While Alaris offers a high dividend yield, Buffett would view this not as an opportunity, but as the market's fair compensation for the embedded risk in its concentrated, equity-like portfolio. For retail investors, the key takeaway is that Buffett would likely avoid Alaris, as its success hinges too much on the performance of a few key partners rather than a wide, unbreachable moat. If forced to choose in this sector, Buffett would favor larger, more diversified, and historically stable operators like Ares Capital (ARCC), Main Street Capital (MAIN), and Golub Capital (GBDC) for their superior scale, focus on safer senior debt, and more consistent dividend histories. A decision change would require Alaris to build a multi-decade track record of stable cash flows with no material credit losses and a much more diversified portfolio.

Charlie Munger

Charlie Munger's investment thesis in specialty finance would prioritize businesses with a durable moat built on superior, repeatable underwriting that avoids capital loss above all else. Alaris's bespoke, concentrated model of providing preferred equity would be viewed with deep suspicion, as its subordination in the capital structure and reliance on a few key partners lacks a sufficient margin of safety. Munger would see the high dividend yield as a red flag signaling high risk, a view confirmed by the company's history of investment write-downs and a past dividend cut—a cardinal sin that demonstrates a failure to protect the downside. Ultimately, he would avoid the stock, considering it a fragile model prone to the types of errors he assiduously seeks to avoid. If forced to choose from the sector, Munger would favor the fortress-like scale and diversification of Ares Capital (ARCC), the exceptional long-term NAV compounding of Main Street Capital (MAIN), or the rigorous, low-loss underwriting of Sixth Street (TSLX). A change in Munger's opinion would require a multi-decade track record of zero capital impairment, proving its underwriting model is truly elite.

Bill Ackman

Bill Ackman would likely view Alaris Equity Partners as a niche capital allocator that falls short of his high-quality standards for investment. He would be drawn to the specialty finance space only if it presented a dominant, scalable platform with a clear underwriting advantage, something Alaris's concentrated portfolio of opaque, private investments does not offer. While the high dividend yield of over 10% might initially seem attractive, Ackman would quickly recognize it as compensation for significant risk, given the company's history of partner underperformance and a dividend cut in 2020. The lack of a strong, unifying brand or moat across its underlying assets, combined with low visibility into their operations, would ultimately lead him to avoid the stock. For Ackman, the path to predictable, long-term free cash flow generation is simply too uncertain. If forced to pick leaders in the space, he would gravitate towards dominant platforms like Ares Capital (ARCC) for its scale and underwriting discipline, KKR (KKR) for its premier global brand and fee-related earnings, and Onex (ONEX.TO) for its deep value discount to NAV. A major strategic shift at Alaris toward significant diversification and demonstrated underwriting consistency over a full cycle would be required for him to reconsider.

Competition

Alaris Equity Partners differentiates itself within the broader specialty finance landscape through its unique investment model. Unlike traditional private equity firms that take controlling stakes or Business Development Companies (BDCs) that primarily provide debt, Alaris offers non-control preferred equity to established, private middle-market businesses. This strategy positions Alaris as a long-term partner rather than an owner, providing capital for growth, succession planning, or shareholder liquidity without forcing a sale of the company. The return for Alaris and its unitholders comes from monthly cash distributions from these partners, structured to be senior to common equity, offering a layer of protection.

This distinct approach creates a specific risk-reward proposition. On one hand, the cash distributions from its partners are typically high, allowing Alaris to fund a substantial dividend for its own investors. The structure can also lead to capital appreciation upon exiting an investment. On the other hand, its portfolio is highly concentrated, with a small number of partners representing a significant portion of its revenue. If one of these private companies faces financial difficulty, it can immediately and materially impact Alaris's cash flow and lead to significant write-downs, which has been a recurring challenge for the firm. This contrasts sharply with larger BDCs that hold diversified portfolios of hundreds of loans, where the failure of one borrower has a much smaller impact.

When evaluated against its competition, Alaris is neither a pure-play lender nor a typical equity investor. Its performance is heavily tied to the operational success and financial discipline of a handful of private enterprises. Competitors in the BDC space offer more predictable income streams backed by diversified loan books and benefit from the scale of their origination platforms. Alaris's success hinges on its ability to perform deep due diligence and structure resilient partnerships. Consequently, an investment in Alaris is a bet on its specialized underwriting skill in a concentrated portfolio, whereas an investment in a top-tier BDC is a bet on the performance of the broader U.S. middle-market credit landscape.

For investors, this means Alaris offers a return stream that is less correlated with public debt and equity markets but is highly correlated to the fortunes of its specific partners. The appeal lies in its high current income and the potential for capital gains from successful partnerships. However, this comes with lower transparency and higher idiosyncratic risk compared to its more diversified peers. The company's competitive position is therefore that of a niche, high-yield specialist, suitable for investors with a high-risk tolerance and a deep understanding of its unique model.

Ares Capital Corporation
ARCC • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is a titan in the specialty finance sector, operating as the largest publicly traded Business Development Company (BDC) in the United States. It provides a stark contrast to Alaris in terms of scale, strategy, and risk profile. While Alaris makes concentrated preferred equity investments, ARCC manages a highly diversified portfolio of hundreds of debt investments in U.S. middle-market companies. This fundamental difference means ARCC offers investors more stable, predictable income derived from loan interest, whereas Alaris provides higher but more volatile cash flows linked to the equity performance of its partners. ARCC represents the blue-chip, diversified approach to specialty finance, while Alaris embodies a higher-risk, concentrated, niche strategy.

Winner: Ares Capital Corporation over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. The verdict is based on ARCC's superior scale, diversification, brand reputation, and more stable risk-adjusted returns. ARCC's primary strength is its fortress-like position as the largest BDC, with a portfolio of over 470 companies, compared to Alaris's portfolio of around 20. This diversification drastically reduces single-name blow-up risk, a weakness that has historically plagued Alaris. While Alaris offers a potentially higher total return if its concentrated bets pay off, its cash flows are lumpier and more vulnerable to the performance of a few key partners. ARCC's focus on senior secured debt (~75% of its portfolio is first or second lien) makes it fundamentally safer than Alaris's preferred equity model. Although Alaris’s high yield is attractive, ARCC provides a compelling, high-single-digit yield with a much stronger safety net, making it the superior choice for most income-oriented investors. The decision hinges on ARCC's proven ability to deliver consistent results through economic cycles, a resilience Alaris is still working to demonstrate.

From a financial standpoint, ARCC’s strength is evident. It consistently generates Net Investment Income (NII) that covers its dividend, with a coverage ratio often exceeding 110%. This provides a safety cushion and the ability to pay supplemental dividends. In contrast, Alaris's payout ratio has been more volatile, sometimes exceeding 100% of cash from operations during challenging periods. On the balance sheet, ARCC maintains a conservative leverage profile, with a net debt-to-equity ratio typically around 1.0x, well within regulatory limits. Alaris’s leverage is structurally different but is exposed to valuation risk on its assets. For revenue growth, ARCC benefits from rising interest rates and a steady stream of new loan originations from its massive platform, while Alaris’s growth is episodic, depending on a few large deployments. Overall, ARCC's financial profile is more resilient and predictable. Overall Financials Winner: Ares Capital Corporation for its superior dividend coverage, stable earnings, and conservative leverage.

In terms of business model and economic moat, ARCC is in a different league. Its brand, Ares, is one of the most respected in alternative credit, giving it unparalleled access to deal flow, particularly from private equity sponsors. This is a massive competitive advantage. Its economies of scale are immense; with a portfolio exceeding $20 billion, its operating costs as a percentage of assets are among the lowest in the industry. Switching costs for its borrowers exist but are not the primary moat; the moat is the origination engine and relationships. Alaris has a good reputation in its niche but lacks this institutional scale and brand power. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Ares Capital Corporation due to its dominant brand, immense scale, and powerful network effects in the private equity ecosystem.

Looking at past performance, ARCC has delivered more consistent and superior risk-adjusted returns. Over the last five years, ARCC has generated a total shareholder return (TSR) that has outperformed AD.UN, with significantly less volatility. For example, during the COVID-19 downturn in March 2020, ARCC's drawdown was sharp but it recovered steadily, while AD.UN faced deeper concerns about the viability of its partners, leading to a dividend cut and a more prolonged recovery. ARCC’s non-accrual rates (loans not paying interest) have remained low, typically below 2%, showcasing strong underwriting. Alaris has had to restructure several investments and take material write-downs over its history, indicating higher portfolio risk. Overall Past Performance Winner: Ares Capital Corporation for delivering better risk-adjusted total returns with greater consistency.

Future growth prospects also favor ARCC. The private credit market is experiencing secular growth as banks pull back from lending. ARCC, as the market leader, is perfectly positioned to capture this demand. Its ability to write large checks gives it access to the most attractive deals with the best sponsors. Alaris's growth is lumpier and depends on finding a few specific partners that fit its unique model each year. While Alaris can grow, its path is less predictable and its addressable market is smaller. Consensus estimates for ARCC project steady growth in NII per share, supported by a strong deal pipeline and favorable interest rate environment. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Ares Capital Corporation due to its commanding position in a secularly growing market.

From a valuation perspective, ARCC typically trades at a premium to its Net Asset Value (NAV), often between 1.0x and 1.10x NAV. This premium is a reflection of the market's confidence in its management and stable earnings, making its ~9.5% dividend yield considered high quality. Alaris is more often valued on a price-to-earnings or dividend yield basis. Its yield is often higher than ARCC's, recently over 10%, which signals the market's perception of higher risk. While Alaris might appear cheaper on a yield basis, the risk-adjusted value proposition is stronger with ARCC. The premium paid for ARCC is justified by its lower risk profile and predictability. Better Value Today: Ares Capital Corporation because its premium valuation is earned through superior quality and stability, offering a more reliable risk-adjusted income stream.
Main Street Capital Corporation
MAIN • NYSE MAIN MARKET
Main Street Capital (MAIN) is a unique Business Development Company that, like Alaris, focuses on both debt and equity investments in smaller, private companies, making it a very relevant peer. MAIN primarily invests in the 'lower middle market,' providing a combination of first-lien debt and direct equity investments. This hybrid strategy allows it to generate steady interest income from debt while capturing significant upside through equity appreciation, which it uses to fund a growing stream of regular and supplemental dividends. While Alaris uses preferred equity, MAIN uses a debt-plus-equity approach, but the shared philosophy of being a long-term capital partner to smaller businesses creates a strong basis for comparison.

Winner: Main Street Capital over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. MAIN wins due to its exceptional long-term track record of value creation, superior diversification, and a more resilient and shareholder-friendly dividend policy. MAIN's key strength is its highly efficient, internally managed structure, which results in one of the lowest cost structures in the industry, maximizing returns for shareholders. Its portfolio is far more diversified than Alaris's, with over 200 investments, which insulates it from single-name blow-ups. Furthermore, MAIN has a remarkable history of never cutting its regular monthly dividend since its IPO and consistently growing its Net Asset Value (NAV) per share, a feat Alaris has not matched. While Alaris's model can produce high cash flows, MAIN has proven its ability to do so more consistently and with less volatility, making it the superior long-term investment.

MAIN's business model and moat are formidable. Its brand is top-tier in the lower middle market, a less competitive space than the upper middle market targeted by giants like ARCC. Its moat comes from its specialized underwriting expertise in this niche and its cost-effective internal management structure. Its operating expenses as a percentage of assets are consistently low (around 1.5%), a significant advantage over externally managed peers and a testament to its scale and efficiency. Alaris, while also specialized, lacks this level of diversification and cost efficiency. MAIN's long history of successful equity exits demonstrates a repeatable process for value creation. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Main Street Capital for its dominant niche position, cost leadership, and proven value creation model.

MAIN's financial statements reflect its operational excellence. Revenue growth has been steady, driven by both interest income and dividend income from its equity portfolio. Its return on equity has consistently been one of the best in the BDC sector, often exceeding 15%. Crucially, its Net Investment Income (NII) and distributable income have consistently covered its monthly dividends, with excess gains funding frequent supplemental dividends. Alaris's dividend coverage has been less consistent. MAIN also maintains a conservative balance sheet with investment-grade ratings and a statutory leverage ratio well below the legal limit. Overall Financials Winner: Main Street Capital due to its best-in-class profitability, rock-solid dividend coverage, and conservative balance sheet.

MAIN's past performance is arguably the best in the BDC industry. Since its 2007 IPO, it has delivered a cumulative total shareholder return that has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 and its BDC peers, including AD.UN over most comparable periods. Its NAV per share has grown steadily, a key indicator of underlying value creation that contrasts with periods of NAV erosion at Alaris due to write-downs. Risk metrics also favor MAIN; its portfolio has proven resilient through multiple economic cycles, and it avoided the dividend cuts that affected many BDCs and Alaris during crises like the GFC and COVID-19. Overall Past Performance Winner: Main Street Capital for its exceptional, long-term, low-volatility shareholder returns.

Looking ahead, MAIN's growth prospects remain solid. It continues to find attractive investment opportunities in its lower-middle-market niche, an area less saturated with capital. Its ability to provide both debt and equity makes it a one-stop shop for smaller businesses, ensuring a healthy pipeline. Its asset management business, which manages external funds, provides an additional, high-margin source of growth. Alaris's growth is more concentrated and dependent on larger, less frequent capital deployments. MAIN's growth engine appears more diversified and sustainable. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Main Street Capital due to its strong position in a less efficient market and multiple levers for continued growth.

Valuation is the one area where the comparison is nuanced. MAIN consistently trades at the highest premium to NAV in the BDC sector, often at 1.5x NAV or more. This is a steep price that reflects its stellar track record and perceived safety. Alaris, in contrast, often trades at a high dividend yield, implying the market sees it as riskier and assigns it a lower valuation multiple. An investor in MAIN is paying a significant premium for quality and consistency. While Alaris appears 'cheaper' on the surface, MAIN's premium has been justified by its performance. For a long-term investor, paying for quality has been the right call. Better Value Today: Main Street Capital, as its premium valuation is a fair price for its best-in-class operational performance and lower-risk profile.
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
TSLX • NYSE MAIN MARKET
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) is a Business Development Company known for its highly disciplined and data-driven underwriting approach, focusing on complex, non-traditional lending situations. TSLX often targets companies with strong enterprise values but in situations that require flexible or creative financing solutions. This focus on complexity and downside protection distinguishes it from many peers and makes for an interesting comparison with Alaris's bespoke, partnership-style investments. While TSLX is primarily a lender, its emphasis on structuring deals with equity-like upside potential through warrants and other features rhymes with Alaris's goal of generating both yield and capital appreciation.

Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. TSLX secures the win based on its superior credit performance, consistent delivery of returns above its cost of capital, and a more transparent and disciplined investment framework. TSLX's key strength is its underwriting culture, which has resulted in an incredibly low history of credit losses since its inception. The company targets a 10% return on equity over the long term and has consistently met or exceeded this goal, providing shareholders with a reliable combination of base dividends and special dividends. Alaris's model is inherently riskier due to its equity-like nature and concentration, and its historical performance has been more volatile, with significant write-downs impacting returns. TSLX offers a more predictable and robust risk-adjusted return stream.

TSLX's business model is built on a moat of informational and analytical advantage. Backed by the global investment firm Sixth Street, TSLX has access to vast resources, data science capabilities, and industry expertise that allow it to underwrite complex deals that other lenders might avoid. This intellectual property is its core advantage. Its brand is synonymous with sophisticated, reliable financing. Alaris has a strong niche expertise but does not possess the same level of institutional infrastructure and data-driven processes. TSLX's ability to structure deals with strong covenants and protections is a key differentiator. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its deep analytical moat and institutional backing.

Financially, TSLX is a fortress. Its revenue stream from its largely floating-rate loan portfolio is stable and has benefited from rising interest rates. The company's return on equity (ROE) is a key focus, and it has consistently generated an ROE above its 10% target, a testament to its profitability. Dividend coverage from Net Investment Income is exceptionally strong, often exceeding 125%, which allows it to regularly pay out special dividends to shareholders. Alaris's cash flow is less predictable. On the balance sheet, TSLX maintains low leverage and a strong liquidity position, with an investment-grade credit rating providing access to cheap, unsecured debt. Overall Financials Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its best-in-class profitability, dividend safety, and balance sheet strength.

TSLX's past performance has been excellent. Since its IPO, it has delivered a top-tier total shareholder return within the BDC sector, with lower volatility than many peers. Most importantly, its cumulative net realized gain/loss on investments is positive, indicating that its underwriting discipline not only avoids losses but also generates gains. This contrasts with Alaris, which has experienced significant realized losses on certain investments throughout its history. TSLX’s Net Asset Value (NAV) per share has been stable and growing, reflecting its value creation. Overall Past Performance Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its outstanding track record of high returns combined with low credit losses.

For future growth, TSLX is well-positioned to capitalize on market dislocations and complexity. As economic uncertainty increases, more companies will require the kind of flexible, well-structured capital that TSLX specializes in providing. Its pipeline remains robust, and its ability to partner with its broader Sixth Street platform gives it access to unique, large-scale opportunities. While Alaris also thrives on providing customized solutions, TSLX’s addressable market is larger and its platform more scalable. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending due to its scalable model and ability to thrive in complex market environments.

From a valuation standpoint, TSLX, like other high-quality BDCs, typically trades at a premium to its Net Asset Value, often in the 1.1x to 1.2x range. This premium reflects the market's appreciation for its superior underwriting and consistent performance. Its dividend yield is usually lower than Alaris's, but the total return has been higher and more reliable. Alaris's higher yield is compensation for its higher risk profile and more concentrated portfolio. An investor in TSLX is paying for a proven track record of downside protection and consistent returns. The saying 'you get what you pay for' applies here. Better Value Today: Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as its premium is justified by a demonstrably lower-risk model and more consistent value creation.
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
GBDC • NASDAQ GLOBAL MARKET
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a prominent, externally managed Business Development Company focused on providing senior secured loans to middle-market companies backed by private equity sponsors. Its strategy is heavily tilted towards safety, with an overwhelming majority of its portfolio (~95%) in first-lien, senior secured loans. This conservative, 'top of the capital stack' approach makes GBDC a reliable income generator, a strong point of contrast to Alaris's higher-risk preferred equity strategy. GBDC is a proxy for stable, professionally managed exposure to the U.S. middle-market direct lending space, prioritizing capital preservation over aggressive growth.

Winner: Golub Capital BDC over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. GBDC wins this comparison due to its superior capital preservation, portfolio diversification, and unwavering credit discipline, which translate into a more reliable dividend for income investors. GBDC's core strength is its relationship with its manager, Golub Capital, a powerhouse in private credit with a long and stellar track record of minimal credit losses. This pedigree in disciplined underwriting provides a level of safety that Alaris, with its concentrated and equity-like risks, cannot match. While GBDC's total return potential may be lower than Alaris's, its path to generating returns is far more predictable and less volatile. For an investor prioritizing stable income and risk management, GBDC is the clear winner.

GBDC's business moat is derived from the scale, reputation, and relationships of its manager, Golub Capital. With over $60 billion in assets under management, the Golub platform is a go-to lender for private equity firms, ensuring a steady flow of high-quality, sponsor-backed deal opportunities. This is a significant competitive advantage. The focus on sponsor-backed deals means its portfolio companies are typically well-vetted and supported by sophisticated owners. Alaris operates in a different world, often partnering with founder-led businesses, which has its own merits but lacks the institutional support structure inherent in GBDC's portfolio. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Golub Capital BDC due to the immense origination power and credibility of its external manager.

GBDC's financial profile is a picture of stability. Its revenue is almost entirely composed of predictable interest income from a floating-rate loan book, making it a direct beneficiary of higher interest rates. Its profitability, measured by Net Investment Income (NII) per share, has been remarkably stable, consistently covering its dividend. The company maintains a conservative leverage profile, an investment-grade credit rating, and a strong liquidity position. In contrast, Alaris’s cash flows are lumpier and subject to the performance of a few key partners. GBDC’s non-accrual rate is consistently among the lowest in the industry, reflecting its strong underwriting. Overall Financials Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its predictable earnings, strong dividend coverage, and fortress balance sheet.

Looking at past performance, GBDC has been a model of consistency. While its total shareholder return may not have shot the lights out, it has delivered steady, low-volatility returns with a focus on preserving its Net Asset Value (NAV). Its NAV per share has been one of the most stable in the BDC sector, a stark contrast to the volatility Alaris's book value has experienced due to investment write-downs. GBDC’s risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) are excellent. Investors in GBDC have experienced a much smoother ride than investors in Alaris, with predictable quarterly dividends and minimal surprises. Overall Past Performance Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its superior capital preservation and low-volatility returns.

GBDC's future growth is tied to the continued expansion of the private credit market and the deal flow from its sponsor relationships. While it may not grow as quickly as more aggressive players, its growth is built on a solid foundation. The company has a strong pipeline of opportunities and the ability to selectively choose the most attractive, lowest-risk deals. The stability of its model makes it a reliable partner for sponsors, ensuring its relevance. Alaris's growth is less predictable and more opportunistic. GBDC’s path is one of steady, incremental expansion. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its sustainable and predictable growth trajectory.

Valuation-wise, GBDC presents an interesting case. It has historically traded at a discount to its NAV, partly due to its external management structure and its focus on lower-yielding, safer loans. Recently, as the market has prioritized safety, that discount has narrowed or even flipped to a small premium. It often trades at a lower valuation than top-tier internal managers like MAIN, but with a higher valuation than riskier BDCs. Alaris's valuation is driven by its high dividend yield, which compensates for risk. GBDC often offers a better risk-adjusted value, providing a safe ~9% yield at a reasonable price-to-book multiple, making it an attractive proposition for conservative income investors. Better Value Today: Golub Capital BDC, as it offers exceptional safety and stability at a valuation that does not command the steep premium of some peers.
FS KKR Capital Corp.
FSK • NYSE MAIN MARKET
FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) is one of the largest Business Development Companies, externally managed by a partnership between FS Investments and KKR, a global investment giant. FSK's strategy involves originating large, complex credit solutions for upper middle-market companies, leveraging the immense scale, sourcing capabilities, and intellectual capital of KKR. After a series of mergers and a significant portfolio rotation, FSK has been working to reposition itself as a higher-quality lender. Its comparison to Alaris highlights the difference between a massive, institutional-scale credit platform undergoing a turnaround and a smaller, niche equity player with a concentrated portfolio.

Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust over FS KKR Capital Corp. This is a closer call, but Alaris edges out FSK due to its simpler, more focused business model and a clearer path to generating its target returns, despite its higher concentration risk. FSK's key weakness has been its historical credit performance and a legacy portfolio that has resulted in significant NAV erosion over the years. While the KKR partnership has brought immense resources and an improved outlook, the company still trades at a persistent, large discount to NAV, reflecting market skepticism. Alaris, for all its faults, has a straightforward model: partner with good businesses and collect cash. FSK's complexity, history of underperformance, and the drag from its external management fees make it a less compelling proposition, even with its diversification benefits.

FSK's business model and moat are theoretically massive, leveraging the KKR brand, which is a global powerhouse in private equity and credit. This gives FSK access to proprietary deal flow and the ability to structure and lead very large financing packages. However, this potential has not always translated into superior shareholder returns. The moat is somewhat diluted by its historical performance issues and a high external management fee structure that creates a drag on returns. Alaris has a smaller, but perhaps more effective, moat in its niche of providing non-control partnership capital, where it has built a solid reputation. Overall Business & Moat Winner: FS KKR Capital Corp. on paper due to the KKR affiliation, but with the major caveat that its execution has been inconsistent.

Financially, FSK's profile is a mixed bag. Its large, floating-rate portfolio generates significant interest income, and its Net Investment Income has generally covered its high dividend yield. However, the quality of that income has been a concern, with a higher-than-average non-accrual rate at times and a history of realized losses that have eaten into its NAV. The company has taken steps to de-risk its portfolio, but the process is ongoing. Alaris's financials are more volatile due to concentration, but its model of collecting steady preferred distributions can be more resilient than a portfolio of troubled loans. FSK's leverage is comparable to peers, but the quality of the underlying assets has been the key issue. Overall Financials Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust, narrowly, because its cash flow stream from performing partners is arguably of higher quality than FSK's earnings, which have been offset by credit issues.

Past performance is a clear weak spot for FSK. Over the last five years, FSK has been a significant underperformer in the BDC space, delivering a negative total shareholder return and substantial NAV per share erosion. The stock has been a 'value trap' for years—cheap for a reason. While recent performance has improved under KKR's more direct oversight, the long-term track record is poor. Alaris has also had its struggles, including a dividend cut, but its long-term performance has not been as dilutive to shareholder capital as FSK's has been. Overall Past Performance Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust by default, as FSK's track record is among the weakest of the large BDCs.

FSK's future growth outlook has improved significantly with the full weight of the KKR platform behind it. The strategy is to rotate out of legacy, lower-quality assets into more conservatively underwritten, KKR-sourced deals. If successful, this turnaround could unlock significant value. This represents a potential catalyst that Alaris lacks. However, it is an execution-dependent story. Alaris's growth is more modest and predictable, based on deploying its capital into a few new partnerships each year. The upside is arguably higher with FSK if the turnaround works, but the risk of continued mediocrity is also high. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: FS KKR Capital Corp. based purely on the potential for a successful, KKR-led turnaround.

Valuation is FSK's main attraction. It consistently trades at one of the largest discounts to NAV in the BDC sector, often in the 0.75x - 0.85x range. This implies that investors can buy its portfolio of loans for 75 to 85 cents on the dollar. Its dividend yield is consequently one of the highest available, often exceeding 12%. The core debate is whether this discount is a fair reflection of its risks or a compelling value opportunity. Alaris also offers a high yield but trades closer to its book value. For deep value, contrarian investors, FSK is tempting. However, the discount exists for a reason. Better Value Today: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust, because its high yield comes from a more transparent, albeit concentrated, model, whereas FSK's high yield is accompanied by a history of capital destruction that makes its 'cheap' valuation a significant risk.
Onex Corporation
ONEX.TO • TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE
Onex Corporation (ONEX.TO) is a leading Canadian alternative asset manager, making it a domestic peer for Alaris, though their business models are fundamentally different. Onex operates two main segments: its Investing segment, where it invests its own substantial balance sheet capital into private equity, credit, and other strategies ('Invested Capital'), and its Asset Management segment, where it manages capital on behalf of third-party institutional clients and earns management and performance fees ('Fee-Generating AUM'). This makes Onex a hybrid of an investment holding company and a traditional asset manager, contrasting with Alaris’s direct, yield-focused investment model.

Winner: Onex Corporation over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. Onex wins this comparison based on its much larger scale, diversified business model, and superior long-term potential for capital appreciation. Onex's key strength lies in its dual engine for value creation: direct investment returns from its large, permanent capital base and the scalable, high-margin fee revenue from its growing asset management platform. This diversification provides multiple ways to win and offers more resilience than Alaris’s model, which is entirely dependent on the cash flows from a small number of direct investments. While Alaris provides a higher current dividend yield, Onex offers a more compelling total return proposition through the long-term compounding of its book value and fee-generating assets.

Onex's business and moat are rooted in its 40-year history and its stellar brand in the private equity world. It is one of Canada's most respected investors, giving it a powerful advantage in sourcing deals and attracting third-party capital. Its large, permanent capital base (~$8 billion of its own capital invested) allows it to be a long-term, patient investor and align its interests with its clients. This is a significant structural advantage. Alaris has built a strong reputation in its specific niche, but it operates on a much smaller scale and lacks Onex's institutional clout and diversified revenue streams. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Onex Corporation due to its premier brand, diversified model, and large permanent capital base.

From a financial perspective, Onex's results are lumpier than a pure-play credit firm but more diversified than Alaris's. Its revenue comes from investment gains (which are volatile), management fees (stable), and performance fees (volatile but high-margin). The key metric for Onex is the growth in its Net Asset Value (NAV) per share over time, which reflects the performance of its invested capital. This has compounded at an attractive rate over decades. Its balance sheet is very strong, with a large cash position and modest leverage. Alaris’s financials are all about generating distributable cash. While its revenue is more predictable in the short term, Onex's model is geared for greater long-term value creation. Overall Financials Winner: Onex Corporation for its stronger balance sheet and greater long-term compounding potential.

Onex's long-term past performance has been excellent, having compounded its capital at a rate significantly outperforming public market benchmarks for decades. However, its performance over the last five years has been more muted as its large private equity funds have navigated a more challenging environment, causing its stock to underperform. Alaris’s performance has also been volatile. Onex's historical track record of creating value through multiple economic cycles is more proven than Alaris's. Despite recent headwinds, Onex’s long-term ability to compound capital is superior. Overall Past Performance Winner: Onex Corporation based on its multi-decade record of value creation.

Future growth for Onex is driven by its ability to scale its asset management platforms, particularly in private credit and wealth management, and the performance of its private equity funds. The company is actively focused on growing its fee-generating AUM, which would make its earnings more stable and command a higher valuation multiple from the market. This represents a significant potential catalyst. Alaris's growth is more linear, tied to the amount of capital it can deploy into new partnerships. Onex has more levers to pull for future growth. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Onex Corporation due to the scalability of its asset management business.

Valuation is a key part of the investment thesis for Onex. The stock frequently trades at a significant discount to its underlying Net Asset Value per share, sometimes as low as 50-60%. This means an investor can buy into its portfolio of private companies and its asset management business for substantially less than their intrinsic value. This discount represents a major margin of safety. Alaris is valued primarily on its dividend yield. While Onex's dividend yield is much lower (~1.5%), its total return potential from closing the NAV gap is substantial. Better Value Today: Onex Corporation, as its profound and persistent discount to NAV offers a more compelling long-term value proposition and margin of safety than Alaris's high-yield, higher-risk model.

Top Similar Companies

Based on industry classification and performance score:

Detailed Analysis

Does Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?

2/5

Alaris operates a unique business model, providing non-control financing to private companies in exchange for monthly cash distributions. Its primary strength lies in its permanent capital structure, which allows it to be a patient, long-term partner without the pressure to sell investments. However, the business is constrained by significant portfolio concentration, where the failure of a single partner can severely impact revenue. This, combined with a mixed track record of underwriting, creates substantial risk. The investor takeaway is mixed; the model is attractive, but its execution risk is high and not suitable for all investors.

Underwriting Track Record
Fail
The company's underwriting history is mixed, marked by both successful partnerships and several significant impairments, indicating that its risk control has not been consistently effective.
The success of Alaris's model hinges on its ability to underwrite risk in private companies. Its historical record shows mixed results. While the company has had many stable, long-term partners and several successful exits where it earned a capital gain, it has also suffered significant losses from failed partnerships. For example, impairments related to partners like 'Sandbox' and 'Kimbel' in past years resulted in substantial write-downs and forced reductions in Alaris's own dividend. These events demonstrate that its underwriting process is not infallible and that its portfolio is susceptible to severe, permanent capital loss. While the company aims for a Fair Value/Cost ratio above 1.0, this has fluctuated, and realized losses have periodically erased gains from other parts of the portfolio. This inconsistent track record suggests the moat derived from its underwriting expertise is narrower than ideal.
Permanent Capital Advantage
Pass
The company's greatest strategic advantage is its permanent capital base from being a public entity, enabling it to be a patient, long-term investor without the pressure of forced exits.
Unlike traditional private equity funds that have a fixed lifespan (typically 7-10 years) and must eventually sell their investments to return capital to investors, Alaris is a publicly-traded trust. This structure provides it with 'permanent capital'—money raised from public unitholders that does not have a redemption date. This is a critical competitive advantage in its niche. It allows Alaris to be a true long-term partner, holding investments indefinitely as long as they perform well. This patience is highly attractive to private business owners and allows Alaris to avoid selling good assets at bad times simply because a fund is nearing its end. The stability of its funding base, which also includes a corporate credit facility, underpins its entire business model and value proposition to potential partners.
Fee Structure Alignment
Pass
With an internally managed structure and no external performance fees, Alaris's management interests are strongly aligned with unitholders, a clear advantage over many externally managed peers.
Alaris operates as an internally managed company, not an external fund manager. This means it does not charge management or incentive fees based on assets under management (AUM) or performance, which is a common practice in the specialty finance industry. Its costs are its own corporate operating expenses (G&A), which are more transparent and generally lower than the fee loads of competitors. This structure aligns management's focus with maximizing long-term per-unit profitability rather than simply growing AUM. Furthermore, insider ownership is meaningful, with executives and directors holding a significant stake in the company. This ensures that management has 'skin in the game,' directly sharing in the successes and failures alongside retail investors. This alignment is a distinct and powerful advantage, as it avoids the potential conflicts of interest inherent in the external manager model.
Portfolio Diversification
Fail
The portfolio is poorly diversified, with a high concentration in its top investments, making unitholder returns highly vulnerable to the failure of a single partner company.
Despite investing across various industries, Alaris's portfolio is highly concentrated. The company typically holds investments in fewer than 30 companies. As of its Q3 2023 reporting, its top 10 partners represented over 70% of its revenue, which is substantially more concentrated than a typical diversified investment vehicle like a BDC or an equity ETF. The largest single partner often contributes more than 10% of total revenue. This lack of diversification is the single most significant risk in Alaris's business model. While a successful large investment can drive strong returns, a failure can be catastrophic for the trust's overall revenue and unit price. This 'all our eggs in a few baskets' approach means investors are heavily exposed to idiosyncratic risks specific to each partner company, a risk that cannot be diversified away within the trust itself.
Contracted Cash Flow Base
Fail
Alaris's revenues are based on contractual distributions from its partners, but these payments are not guaranteed and can be cut if a partner's business deteriorates, making cash flow less visible than for businesses with ironclad contracts.
Alaris's revenue stream is derived from preferred distributions contractually agreed upon with its portfolio companies. While this appears predictable, the cash flow visibility is weaker than that of companies with guaranteed or regulated revenue. The payments are contingent on the ongoing financial health and performance of the underlying private businesses. If a partner faces operational challenges or an economic downturn, it can (and sometimes must) suspend these distributions to preserve cash. Alaris has experienced this multiple times in its history, leading to sudden drops in revenue. For instance, as of late 2023, the company's largest partner, 'PF,' accounted for approximately 13% of revenue, highlighting the concentration risk. While these are legally binding contracts, they are not equivalent to a bond payment from a blue-chip company; the counterparty risk is significantly higher. Therefore, the contractual base provides a forecast but not a guarantee.

How Strong Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Financial Statements?

2/5

Alaris Equity Partners shows a mixed but concerning financial picture. While the company has reported high profits recently, these are heavily influenced by non-cash gains and are not consistently converting into real cash flow. Operating cash flow was positive in the latest quarter at $19.2M but was deeply negative at -$69.16M the quarter before, and its debt has more than doubled since the end of 2024 to $152M. The investor takeaway is negative, as the company's volatile cash flow and rising debt create significant risks for the sustainability of its high dividend.

Leverage and Interest Cover
Fail
While the company's overall debt-to-equity ratio remains low, its total debt has more than doubled in the last year to fund cash flow shortfalls, a worrying trend.
Alaris's debt profile has changed materially for the worse. Total debt surged from $64.64M at the end of fiscal 2024 to $151.98M by Q3 2025. This increase was not for strategic growth but was primarily to plug the cash flow deficit seen in Q2, where the company took on $87.8M in net new debt. Although its debt-to-equity ratio remains low at 0.13 and its debt-to-EBITDA ratio is a manageable 1.04, the speed and reason for this debt accumulation are major red flags. Using leverage to fund operations and shareholder returns, rather than productive investments, signals underlying financial stress.
Cash Flow and Coverage
Fail
Cash flow is highly volatile and has recently been insufficient to consistently cover its substantial dividend, creating a significant risk for income investors.
Alaris's ability to cover its distributions with internally generated cash is poor. In fiscal year 2024, its free cash flow (FCF) of $59.37M did not fully cover the $61.92M paid in dividends. The situation deteriorated significantly in Q2 2025, which saw a negative FCF of -$69.16M, meaning operations consumed cash while the company still paid out $15.5M in dividends. Although FCF recovered to $19.2M in Q3 2025 and covered that quarter's $15.47M dividend, this one positive quarter does not offset the clear pattern of inconsistent and insufficient cash generation. With a very low cash balance of $5.99M, the company has no buffer to sustain payouts during weak periods without resorting to debt.
Operating Margin Discipline
Pass
The company reports exceptionally high operating margins, but these are distorted by volatile non-cash revenue items, making them an unreliable indicator of core operational efficiency.
On paper, Alaris demonstrates strong margin discipline, with operating margins consistently above 80% (93.32% in Q3 2025). This is largely due to its business model, where revenue from investments greatly outweighs the relatively small and stable corporate operating expenses, which were just $5.01M in the latest quarter. Selling, General & Administrative costs are also modest. However, the 'revenue' line item is extremely volatile as it includes non-cash and unrealized gains or losses from investments and currency movements. Therefore, while the company's fixed costs appear well-controlled, the headline operating margin is not a reliable measure of its underlying operational health due to the poor quality of the revenue figure.
Realized vs Unrealized Earnings
Fail
A significant portion of reported net income comes from unrealized, non-cash items like currency fluctuations, making earnings quality poor and unreliable for assessing performance.
Alaris's earnings mix is heavily skewed towards unrealized, non-cash items, which masks its true cash-generating ability. In fiscal 2024, net income was $234.42M, but this was inflated by an $80.82M currency gain and other non-cash adjustments; actual cash from operations was only $59.37M. This pattern is consistent in recent quarters: Q2 2025's net loss was driven by a -$44.79M currency loss, while Q3 2025's profit was boosted by an $18.52M currency gain. This reliance on mark-to-market accounting and foreign exchange movements means reported earnings are not a trustworthy source for judging the company's ability to generate the cash required to sustain its dividend.
NAV Transparency
Pass
As a specialty capital provider and not a fund, Net Asset Value (NAV) is not a primary metric; however, its tangible book value per share has remained stable, which is a positive sign.
This factor, focused on NAV, is not perfectly applicable to Alaris's business structure. We can use Tangible Book Value (TBV) per share as a proxy for the underlying value of its assets. As of Q3 2025, its TBV per share stood at $25.17, which is slightly higher than the $24.15 reported at the end of fiscal 2024. This stability suggests that the value of its investment portfolio has not deteriorated despite market volatility. However, the financial statements do not provide detailed transparency into the valuation methods or the breakdown of assets (e.g., Level 3 assets), which remains a blind spot for investors. Given the stability of the book value, this factor passes, but with reservations about transparency.

How Has Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Performed Historically?

3/5

Alaris's past performance is a story of high returns coupled with high volatility. Over the last five years, the company has demonstrated an ability to generate impressive profits, with Return on Equity averaging over 15% since 2021. Its main strength is a consistent and growing dividend, which currently offers a high yield. However, its primary weakness is the unpredictable nature of its revenue and earnings, which have seen dramatic swings like a 210% revenue increase in 2021 followed by a 36% drop in 2024. For investors, the takeaway is mixed: Alaris offers a substantial income stream but requires a tolerance for significant business and stock price volatility.

AUM and Deployment Trend
Pass
While specific AUM data is not provided, the company's history of deploying capital into long-term investments has successfully fueled volatile but ultimately profitable returns.
As a specialty capital provider, Alaris's core activity is deploying capital. This is reflected in its balance sheet, where 'Long Term Investments' grew from $880.5 million in 2020 to $1.185 billion in 2024. The cash flow statement also shows significant investment activity, such as $238 million invested in securities in 2021. This deployment is the engine for the company's revenue, which comes from distributions and gains on these investments. The lumpy nature of revenue suggests that capital deployment and, more importantly, the realization of profits from those investments, are episodic rather than smooth. The model has proven effective at generating high profits, but the lack of consistent year-over-year growth in revenue highlights the unpredictable nature of its success.
Revenue and EPS History
Fail
The company's history is defined by extremely volatile revenue and earnings, with massive swings from one year to the next that make it impossible to identify a consistent growth trend.
A review of Alaris's past performance shows anything but stable growth. Revenue growth figures are erratic: +210% in 2021, -6% in 2022, +22% in 2023, and -36% in 2024. Earnings per share (EPS) follows a similarly unpredictable path. This is a direct result of the company's business model, which relies on the performance of its partners and the timing of investment exits. While the company can be highly profitable, the lack of predictability and consistency is a significant historical weakness. For an investor looking for a steady growth story, Alaris's record would be a major concern.
TSR and Drawdowns
Fail
Reflecting its volatile business, the stock has delivered positive long-term returns but with higher-than-average risk and significant price swings along the way.
The stock's performance history mirrors the choppiness of its financial results. With a beta of 1.39, the stock has historically been about 39% more volatile than the overall market. While total shareholder returns have been positive in most of the last five years, they have also included periods of significant underperformance, such as a -23.58% return in 2021. This indicates that while investors may be rewarded over the long run, especially with the high dividend, they must be prepared to endure considerable volatility and potential drawdowns. This risk profile is not suitable for all investors.
Return on Equity Trend
Pass
The company has generated strong but volatile returns on equity, averaging over `15%` in the last four years, indicating it has been highly effective at converting its capital into profits.
Alaris has demonstrated strong profitability in recent years. Its Return on Equity (ROE) was impressive at 20.7% in 2021, 15.5% in 2022, 14.9% in 2023, and 22.7% in 2024. These figures are a significant improvement from the 3.4% recorded in 2020 and suggest a durable ability to earn high returns in its niche market. This level of return indicates that management has been efficient in using shareholder capital to generate profits. However, the volatility in ROE reflects the underlying lumpiness of the company's earnings.
Dividend and Buyback History
Pass
Alaris has a strong track record of paying a reliable and gradually increasing dividend, though investors have faced share dilution over the past five years.
The company's commitment to its dividend is a key feature of its history. Dividend per share has grown from $1.28 in 2021 to $1.36 in 2024, providing a stable income stream for investors. The dividend has generally been covered by free cash flow, although coverage was very tight in FY2024, with $59 million in FCF against $62 million in dividends paid. The primary drawback has been shareholder dilution. The total number of shares outstanding increased from 39 million in 2020 to 45 million by the end of 2023, before a slight reduction in 2024. While the dividend history is a clear positive, the dilutive share issuances are a historical weakness.

What Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Future Growth Prospects?

3/5

Alaris's future growth hinges on its ability to successfully deploy capital into new private company partnerships at high yields. The current environment of expensive traditional financing presents a tailwind, potentially increasing demand for its unique, non-control capital. However, this is offset by the significant headwind of a potential economic slowdown, which could impair its existing, highly concentrated portfolio. Compared to larger, more diversified private credit funds, Alaris's growth will likely be slower and lumpier, dependent on a handful of large deals each year. The investor takeaway is mixed, as the potential for high-yield growth is directly tied to substantial, company-specific underwriting risks.

Contract Backlog Growth
Fail
While revenues are contractual, the 'backlog' of future distributions is unreliable due to a history of partner underperformance leading to payment deferrals and write-downs, indicating poor cash flow visibility.
Alaris's revenue is derived from contractually agreed-upon preferred distributions from its partners. However, this backlog is not as secure as it appears. The company has a track record of partners facing financial distress, resulting in the suspension or reduction of these payments. This makes the future revenue stream less predictable than that of a company with ironclad, non-cancellable contracts with high-credit-quality customers. The lack of true long-term visibility and the portfolio's high concentration mean that the failure of a single large partner can materially impact the entire backlog overnight. This recurring issue of impairments and renegotiated terms demonstrates a fundamental weakness in the quality and durability of the contracted cash flows.
Funding Cost and Spread
Pass
The company maintains a strong and profitable spread between its high-yielding investments and its relatively low, predominantly fixed-rate cost of debt.
Alaris's business model is built on the spread between its asset yield and its funding cost, which remains robust. The weighted average yield on its portfolio is consistently high, often in the 14% range. This is funded by a mix of public equity and corporate debt. The company's primary credit facility often has a significant portion fixed or hedged, insulating its earnings from the full impact of rising interest rates. This results in a wide and attractive net investment spread, which is the primary driver of earnings. While a higher rate environment increases borrowing costs, the very high yield on Alaris's assets provides a substantial buffer, ensuring continued profitability.
Fundraising Momentum
Pass
This factor is not directly applicable; however, Alaris's permanent capital structure as a public entity provides a stable and perpetual source of funding for growth, which is a key strategic advantage.
Alaris does not raise capital through traditional fundraising or new fund vehicles like an asset manager. Instead, it sources growth capital from three main areas: public equity markets by issuing new units, its corporate credit facility, and cash recycled from partner redemptions. This 'permanent capital' structure is a significant advantage, as it does not have to return money to investors and can hold investments indefinitely. This provides a stable, long-term capital base that allows it to execute its patient investment strategy without the pressure of a fixed fund life. This reliable and flexible access to capital is a core strength supporting its future growth.
Deployment Pipeline
Pass
Alaris maintains a healthy deployment pipeline and has sufficient access to capital through its credit facility and partner redemptions to fund near-term growth.
Future growth is contingent on deploying new capital, and Alaris has demonstrated a consistent ability to do so. The company typically provides annual deployment guidance, often in the range of $150 million to $250 million, and has a history of meeting or exceeding these targets. Its 'dry powder' comes from its corporate credit facility, which provides several hundred million in available capital, as well as cash generated from the redemption of previous investments. This access to liquidity allows the company to act on new partnership opportunities as they arise, providing a clear path to growing its revenue-generating asset base. The company's ability to continually source and fund new deals is a core strength.
M&A and Asset Rotation
Fail
The company's history of asset rotation is inconsistent, with successful exits and capital gains being periodically offset by underperforming investments that are redeemed at or below cost.
Asset rotation, or 'redemptions' in Alaris's terms, is a key component of its capital allocation strategy, freeing up capital for new investments. However, the track record is mixed. While Alaris has achieved several successful exits that generated attractive internal rates of return (IRR) and capital gains, it has also had to manage numerous underperforming partners. In these cases, a redemption may occur at or below the initial investment cost, resulting in no gain or even a realized loss. This inconsistency in generating profitable exits prevents asset rotation from being a reliable and accretive driver of growth, making it a source of lumpiness and risk rather than a clear strength.

Is Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Fairly Valued?

4/5

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust appears undervalued at its current price of C$21.60. The stock's valuation is attractive based on its low Price-to-Book ratio of 0.86 and normalized Price-to-Earnings ratio of 6.87, which are well below historical averages. Its substantial 6.85% forward dividend yield is a key feature, but this strength is undermined by inconsistent and recently negative free cash flow. The market is discounting the stock due to this cash flow volatility and past underwriting issues. The investor takeaway is mixed but leans positive for those comfortable with the risks, as the current price offers a compelling entry point based on asset value.

NAV/Book Discount Check
Pass
The stock trades at a significant discount to its net asset value, with a Price-to-Book ratio of 0.86 against a record-high book value per share of C$25.10.
This is one of the strongest arguments for Alaris being undervalued. The company recently reported a record Net Book Value per unit of C$25.10. With the stock trading at C$21.60, this represents a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 0.86. In simple terms, this means an investor can buy a claim on the company's assets for just 86 cents on the dollar. For a company whose entire business is owning a portfolio of financial assets, this discount is a powerful valuation signal. While a discount may be warranted due to concerns about the quality or future performance of those private assets, the current 14% discount to NAV provides a substantial margin of safety for investors, making this a clear pass.
Earnings Multiple Check
Pass
The stock's current normalized P/E ratio of 6.87 is substantially below its ten-year historical average of 16.99, indicating it is cheap relative to its own past.
Alaris currently trades at a normalized Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiple of 6.87. This is significantly lower than its 10-year historical average P/E of 16.99, suggesting the stock is inexpensive compared to its own history. However, this comes with a major caveat highlighted in previous analyses: the quality of Alaris's earnings is poor. Net income is often distorted by large, unrealized, non-cash items like currency gains or losses, making the "E" in the P/E ratio an unreliable indicator of true performance. Despite this, the sheer size of the discount to its historical average is noteworthy. It signals that market sentiment is currently very low, which could provide an opportunity if the company's underlying performance stabilizes. Therefore, this factor passes, but with reservations about the quality of the earnings metric.
Yield and Growth Support
Fail
The high forward dividend yield of over 6.8% is attractive, but it is not reliably supported by the company's volatile and recently negative free cash flow.
The company's forward dividend yield of approximately 6.85% is compelling for income-seeking investors. However, this payout is on shaky ground. The prior financial analysis highlighted that free cash flow (FCF) is extremely volatile and has recently been insufficient to cover dividend payments, forcing the company to take on debt to fund shareholder returns. For instance, TTM FCF per share was negative C$-0.49 as of September 2025, while the company continues to pay a substantial dividend. While the payout ratio based on volatile accounting earnings appears low (38.42%), the cash flow coverage is poor. A high yield is only valuable if it is sustainable, and the underlying cash generation at Alaris does not consistently support the current distribution level, making this a failing factor.
Price to Distributable Earnings
Pass
While official Distributable Earnings are not available, using normalized Free Cash Flow as a proxy, the Price-to-FCF ratio appears reasonable, though the underlying cash flow is highly inconsistent.
This factor is not perfectly applicable as Alaris does not consistently report "Distributable Earnings" (DE) as a key metric in the way many income trusts do. We must use Free Cash Flow (FCF) per share as the closest proxy for cash available to be returned to shareholders. As established, FCF is extremely volatile, swinging from deeply negative to positive quarter-over-quarter. For the three months ended September 2025, FCF per share was C$0.39. Annualizing this would be difficult and misleading. However, using the more stable FY2024 FCF of C$59.4M, the FCF per share was ~C$1.30. This gives a Price-to-Normalized-FCF ratio of ~16.6x (21.60 / 1.30), which is not excessively high. Given the difficulty in measurement but the reasonable ratio against a normalized figure, this factor is rated a pass, with the strong caution that FCF consistency is the primary business risk.
Leverage-Adjusted Multiple
Pass
Despite a recent increase in debt to cover cash shortfalls, the company's overall leverage remains low, with a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 0.13 and manageable debt service.
While the FinancialStatementAnalysis correctly flagged a worrisome trend of rising debt to fund cash shortfalls, the company's overall leverage remains at a conservative level. Key metrics like Net Debt/EBITDA and the Debt-to-Equity ratio of 0.13 are low for a financial services company. This low leverage provides a crucial buffer and financial flexibility. An EV/EBITDA multiple, which accounts for debt, would also likely appear low given the company's high reported EBITDA. Although the reason for the recent debt increase is a red flag, the absolute level of leverage does not yet pose a threat to the company's solvency. This structural strength means the stock's cheap valuation is not a "value trap" caused by excessive debt, allowing this factor to pass.

Detailed Future Risks

The primary risk facing Alaris is macroeconomic sensitivity. Its business model involves collecting distributions from a portfolio of mid-sized private companies, which are inherently more vulnerable to economic slowdowns than large, publicly-traded corporations. A future recession could lead to declining revenues and profits for these partners, increasing the likelihood of them deferring or reducing their payments to Alaris. Furthermore, a sustained 'higher-for-longer' interest rate environment presents a significant challenge. It directly increases the cost for Alaris to service its own debt, squeezing the net cash flow available to pay its own unitholders. While higher rates might make Alaris's capital more attractive relative to traditional bank debt, it also raises the risk profile of potential new partners who may be struggling with higher costs across their business.

Competition in the private capital space represents a growing industry-wide risk. Alaris competes with a vast and expanding universe of private equity firms, credit funds, and family offices, all searching for attractive investment opportunities. This intense competition can drive down the potential returns on new deployments, forcing Alaris to either accept lower yields or take on greater risk to achieve its target returns. This risk is amplified by Alaris's portfolio concentration. With its revenue derived from a relatively small number of partners (typically 15-20 companies), the underperformance of even a single large partner can have a material impact on its overall financial results. A default or restructuring from a partner contributing 5% or more of revenue would immediately pressure Alaris's cash flow and its ability to cover its dividend.

Ultimately, the key risk for investors is the sustainability of Alaris's dividend, which is the core of its investment thesis. The dividend is not guaranteed; it is funded directly by the cash received from its partners. Unlike a lender, Alaris's claim on its partners' cash flow is subordinate to their senior debt, meaning they get paid after the banks. The company's 'Run Rate Payout Ratio' is the most important metric to monitor for dividend safety. If this ratio climbs and remains elevated, particularly above 90%, it signals a thin margin of safety. Any unexpected disruption from a partner company could force management to choose between taking on more debt or cutting the distribution to unitholders, either of which would likely have a negative impact on the unit price.

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD.UN)

CAN: TSX

56%

Current Price

20.50

52 Week Range

16.58 - 21.47

Market Cap

929.45M

EPS (Diluted TTM)

3.48

P/E Ratio

5.88

Forward P/E

9.26

Avg Volume (3M)

75,385

Day Volume

272,035

Total Revenue (TTM)

172.46M

Net Income (TTM)

169.00M

Annual Dividend

1.48

Dividend Yield

7.22%

Current Price

52 Week Range

Market Cap

EPS (Diluted TTM)

P/E Ratio

Forward P/E

Avg Volume (3M)

Day Volume

Total Revenue (TTM)

Net Income (TTM)

Annual Dividend

Dividend Yield

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

2/5

Financial Statement Analysis

2/5

Past Performance

3/5

Future Growth

3/5

Fair Value

4/5

Future Risks

Alaris's success is closely tied to the health of its private company partners, making it vulnerable to economic downturns that could disrupt their cash flow and payments. Persistently high interest rates pose a dual threat by increasing Alaris's own borrowing costs and potentially weakening its partners. Given its reliance on a concentrated portfolio of companies, underperformance from just a few key partners could jeopardize its revenue stream. Investors should closely watch the dividend payout ratio and the financial stability of its largest investments.

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Warren Buffett

Charlie Munger

Bill Ackman

Competition

Ares Capital Corporation
ARCC • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is a titan in the specialty finance sector, operating as the largest publicly traded Business Development Company (BDC) in the United States. It provides a stark contrast to Alaris in terms of scale, strategy, and risk profile. While Alaris makes concentrated preferred equity investments, ARCC manages a highly diversified portfolio of hundreds of debt investments in U.S. middle-market companies. This fundamental difference means ARCC offers investors more stable, predictable income derived from loan interest, whereas Alaris provides higher but more volatile cash flows linked to the equity performance of its partners. ARCC represents the blue-chip, diversified approach to specialty finance, while Alaris embodies a higher-risk, concentrated, niche strategy.

Winner: Ares Capital Corporation over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. The verdict is based on ARCC's superior scale, diversification, brand reputation, and more stable risk-adjusted returns. ARCC's primary strength is its fortress-like position as the largest BDC, with a portfolio of over 470 companies, compared to Alaris's portfolio of around 20. This diversification drastically reduces single-name blow-up risk, a weakness that has historically plagued Alaris. While Alaris offers a potentially higher total return if its concentrated bets pay off, its cash flows are lumpier and more vulnerable to the performance of a few key partners. ARCC's focus on senior secured debt (~75% of its portfolio is first or second lien) makes it fundamentally safer than Alaris's preferred equity model. Although Alaris’s high yield is attractive, ARCC provides a compelling, high-single-digit yield with a much stronger safety net, making it the superior choice for most income-oriented investors. The decision hinges on ARCC's proven ability to deliver consistent results through economic cycles, a resilience Alaris is still working to demonstrate.

From a financial standpoint, ARCC’s strength is evident. It consistently generates Net Investment Income (NII) that covers its dividend, with a coverage ratio often exceeding 110%. This provides a safety cushion and the ability to pay supplemental dividends. In contrast, Alaris's payout ratio has been more volatile, sometimes exceeding 100% of cash from operations during challenging periods. On the balance sheet, ARCC maintains a conservative leverage profile, with a net debt-to-equity ratio typically around 1.0x, well within regulatory limits. Alaris’s leverage is structurally different but is exposed to valuation risk on its assets. For revenue growth, ARCC benefits from rising interest rates and a steady stream of new loan originations from its massive platform, while Alaris’s growth is episodic, depending on a few large deployments. Overall, ARCC's financial profile is more resilient and predictable. Overall Financials Winner: Ares Capital Corporation for its superior dividend coverage, stable earnings, and conservative leverage.

In terms of business model and economic moat, ARCC is in a different league. Its brand, Ares, is one of the most respected in alternative credit, giving it unparalleled access to deal flow, particularly from private equity sponsors. This is a massive competitive advantage. Its economies of scale are immense; with a portfolio exceeding $20 billion, its operating costs as a percentage of assets are among the lowest in the industry. Switching costs for its borrowers exist but are not the primary moat; the moat is the origination engine and relationships. Alaris has a good reputation in its niche but lacks this institutional scale and brand power. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Ares Capital Corporation due to its dominant brand, immense scale, and powerful network effects in the private equity ecosystem.

Looking at past performance, ARCC has delivered more consistent and superior risk-adjusted returns. Over the last five years, ARCC has generated a total shareholder return (TSR) that has outperformed AD.UN, with significantly less volatility. For example, during the COVID-19 downturn in March 2020, ARCC's drawdown was sharp but it recovered steadily, while AD.UN faced deeper concerns about the viability of its partners, leading to a dividend cut and a more prolonged recovery. ARCC’s non-accrual rates (loans not paying interest) have remained low, typically below 2%, showcasing strong underwriting. Alaris has had to restructure several investments and take material write-downs over its history, indicating higher portfolio risk. Overall Past Performance Winner: Ares Capital Corporation for delivering better risk-adjusted total returns with greater consistency.

Future growth prospects also favor ARCC. The private credit market is experiencing secular growth as banks pull back from lending. ARCC, as the market leader, is perfectly positioned to capture this demand. Its ability to write large checks gives it access to the most attractive deals with the best sponsors. Alaris's growth is lumpier and depends on finding a few specific partners that fit its unique model each year. While Alaris can grow, its path is less predictable and its addressable market is smaller. Consensus estimates for ARCC project steady growth in NII per share, supported by a strong deal pipeline and favorable interest rate environment. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Ares Capital Corporation due to its commanding position in a secularly growing market.

From a valuation perspective, ARCC typically trades at a premium to its Net Asset Value (NAV), often between 1.0x and 1.10x NAV. This premium is a reflection of the market's confidence in its management and stable earnings, making its ~9.5% dividend yield considered high quality. Alaris is more often valued on a price-to-earnings or dividend yield basis. Its yield is often higher than ARCC's, recently over 10%, which signals the market's perception of higher risk. While Alaris might appear cheaper on a yield basis, the risk-adjusted value proposition is stronger with ARCC. The premium paid for ARCC is justified by its lower risk profile and predictability. Better Value Today: Ares Capital Corporation because its premium valuation is earned through superior quality and stability, offering a more reliable risk-adjusted income stream.
Main Street Capital Corporation
MAIN • NYSE MAIN MARKET
Main Street Capital (MAIN) is a unique Business Development Company that, like Alaris, focuses on both debt and equity investments in smaller, private companies, making it a very relevant peer. MAIN primarily invests in the 'lower middle market,' providing a combination of first-lien debt and direct equity investments. This hybrid strategy allows it to generate steady interest income from debt while capturing significant upside through equity appreciation, which it uses to fund a growing stream of regular and supplemental dividends. While Alaris uses preferred equity, MAIN uses a debt-plus-equity approach, but the shared philosophy of being a long-term capital partner to smaller businesses creates a strong basis for comparison.

Winner: Main Street Capital over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. MAIN wins due to its exceptional long-term track record of value creation, superior diversification, and a more resilient and shareholder-friendly dividend policy. MAIN's key strength is its highly efficient, internally managed structure, which results in one of the lowest cost structures in the industry, maximizing returns for shareholders. Its portfolio is far more diversified than Alaris's, with over 200 investments, which insulates it from single-name blow-ups. Furthermore, MAIN has a remarkable history of never cutting its regular monthly dividend since its IPO and consistently growing its Net Asset Value (NAV) per share, a feat Alaris has not matched. While Alaris's model can produce high cash flows, MAIN has proven its ability to do so more consistently and with less volatility, making it the superior long-term investment.

MAIN's business model and moat are formidable. Its brand is top-tier in the lower middle market, a less competitive space than the upper middle market targeted by giants like ARCC. Its moat comes from its specialized underwriting expertise in this niche and its cost-effective internal management structure. Its operating expenses as a percentage of assets are consistently low (around 1.5%), a significant advantage over externally managed peers and a testament to its scale and efficiency. Alaris, while also specialized, lacks this level of diversification and cost efficiency. MAIN's long history of successful equity exits demonstrates a repeatable process for value creation. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Main Street Capital for its dominant niche position, cost leadership, and proven value creation model.

MAIN's financial statements reflect its operational excellence. Revenue growth has been steady, driven by both interest income and dividend income from its equity portfolio. Its return on equity has consistently been one of the best in the BDC sector, often exceeding 15%. Crucially, its Net Investment Income (NII) and distributable income have consistently covered its monthly dividends, with excess gains funding frequent supplemental dividends. Alaris's dividend coverage has been less consistent. MAIN also maintains a conservative balance sheet with investment-grade ratings and a statutory leverage ratio well below the legal limit. Overall Financials Winner: Main Street Capital due to its best-in-class profitability, rock-solid dividend coverage, and conservative balance sheet.

MAIN's past performance is arguably the best in the BDC industry. Since its 2007 IPO, it has delivered a cumulative total shareholder return that has significantly outperformed the S&P 500 and its BDC peers, including AD.UN over most comparable periods. Its NAV per share has grown steadily, a key indicator of underlying value creation that contrasts with periods of NAV erosion at Alaris due to write-downs. Risk metrics also favor MAIN; its portfolio has proven resilient through multiple economic cycles, and it avoided the dividend cuts that affected many BDCs and Alaris during crises like the GFC and COVID-19. Overall Past Performance Winner: Main Street Capital for its exceptional, long-term, low-volatility shareholder returns.

Looking ahead, MAIN's growth prospects remain solid. It continues to find attractive investment opportunities in its lower-middle-market niche, an area less saturated with capital. Its ability to provide both debt and equity makes it a one-stop shop for smaller businesses, ensuring a healthy pipeline. Its asset management business, which manages external funds, provides an additional, high-margin source of growth. Alaris's growth is more concentrated and dependent on larger, less frequent capital deployments. MAIN's growth engine appears more diversified and sustainable. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Main Street Capital due to its strong position in a less efficient market and multiple levers for continued growth.

Valuation is the one area where the comparison is nuanced. MAIN consistently trades at the highest premium to NAV in the BDC sector, often at 1.5x NAV or more. This is a steep price that reflects its stellar track record and perceived safety. Alaris, in contrast, often trades at a high dividend yield, implying the market sees it as riskier and assigns it a lower valuation multiple. An investor in MAIN is paying a significant premium for quality and consistency. While Alaris appears 'cheaper' on the surface, MAIN's premium has been justified by its performance. For a long-term investor, paying for quality has been the right call. Better Value Today: Main Street Capital, as its premium valuation is a fair price for its best-in-class operational performance and lower-risk profile.
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
TSLX • NYSE MAIN MARKET
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) is a Business Development Company known for its highly disciplined and data-driven underwriting approach, focusing on complex, non-traditional lending situations. TSLX often targets companies with strong enterprise values but in situations that require flexible or creative financing solutions. This focus on complexity and downside protection distinguishes it from many peers and makes for an interesting comparison with Alaris's bespoke, partnership-style investments. While TSLX is primarily a lender, its emphasis on structuring deals with equity-like upside potential through warrants and other features rhymes with Alaris's goal of generating both yield and capital appreciation.

Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. TSLX secures the win based on its superior credit performance, consistent delivery of returns above its cost of capital, and a more transparent and disciplined investment framework. TSLX's key strength is its underwriting culture, which has resulted in an incredibly low history of credit losses since its inception. The company targets a 10% return on equity over the long term and has consistently met or exceeded this goal, providing shareholders with a reliable combination of base dividends and special dividends. Alaris's model is inherently riskier due to its equity-like nature and concentration, and its historical performance has been more volatile, with significant write-downs impacting returns. TSLX offers a more predictable and robust risk-adjusted return stream.

TSLX's business model is built on a moat of informational and analytical advantage. Backed by the global investment firm Sixth Street, TSLX has access to vast resources, data science capabilities, and industry expertise that allow it to underwrite complex deals that other lenders might avoid. This intellectual property is its core advantage. Its brand is synonymous with sophisticated, reliable financing. Alaris has a strong niche expertise but does not possess the same level of institutional infrastructure and data-driven processes. TSLX's ability to structure deals with strong covenants and protections is a key differentiator. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its deep analytical moat and institutional backing.

Financially, TSLX is a fortress. Its revenue stream from its largely floating-rate loan portfolio is stable and has benefited from rising interest rates. The company's return on equity (ROE) is a key focus, and it has consistently generated an ROE above its 10% target, a testament to its profitability. Dividend coverage from Net Investment Income is exceptionally strong, often exceeding 125%, which allows it to regularly pay out special dividends to shareholders. Alaris's cash flow is less predictable. On the balance sheet, TSLX maintains low leverage and a strong liquidity position, with an investment-grade credit rating providing access to cheap, unsecured debt. Overall Financials Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its best-in-class profitability, dividend safety, and balance sheet strength.

TSLX's past performance has been excellent. Since its IPO, it has delivered a top-tier total shareholder return within the BDC sector, with lower volatility than many peers. Most importantly, its cumulative net realized gain/loss on investments is positive, indicating that its underwriting discipline not only avoids losses but also generates gains. This contrasts with Alaris, which has experienced significant realized losses on certain investments throughout its history. TSLX’s Net Asset Value (NAV) per share has been stable and growing, reflecting its value creation. Overall Past Performance Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending for its outstanding track record of high returns combined with low credit losses.

For future growth, TSLX is well-positioned to capitalize on market dislocations and complexity. As economic uncertainty increases, more companies will require the kind of flexible, well-structured capital that TSLX specializes in providing. Its pipeline remains robust, and its ability to partner with its broader Sixth Street platform gives it access to unique, large-scale opportunities. While Alaris also thrives on providing customized solutions, TSLX’s addressable market is larger and its platform more scalable. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Sixth Street Specialty Lending due to its scalable model and ability to thrive in complex market environments.

From a valuation standpoint, TSLX, like other high-quality BDCs, typically trades at a premium to its Net Asset Value, often in the 1.1x to 1.2x range. This premium reflects the market's appreciation for its superior underwriting and consistent performance. Its dividend yield is usually lower than Alaris's, but the total return has been higher and more reliable. Alaris's higher yield is compensation for its higher risk profile and more concentrated portfolio. An investor in TSLX is paying for a proven track record of downside protection and consistent returns. The saying 'you get what you pay for' applies here. Better Value Today: Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as its premium is justified by a demonstrably lower-risk model and more consistent value creation.
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
GBDC • NASDAQ GLOBAL MARKET
Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a prominent, externally managed Business Development Company focused on providing senior secured loans to middle-market companies backed by private equity sponsors. Its strategy is heavily tilted towards safety, with an overwhelming majority of its portfolio (~95%) in first-lien, senior secured loans. This conservative, 'top of the capital stack' approach makes GBDC a reliable income generator, a strong point of contrast to Alaris's higher-risk preferred equity strategy. GBDC is a proxy for stable, professionally managed exposure to the U.S. middle-market direct lending space, prioritizing capital preservation over aggressive growth.

Winner: Golub Capital BDC over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. GBDC wins this comparison due to its superior capital preservation, portfolio diversification, and unwavering credit discipline, which translate into a more reliable dividend for income investors. GBDC's core strength is its relationship with its manager, Golub Capital, a powerhouse in private credit with a long and stellar track record of minimal credit losses. This pedigree in disciplined underwriting provides a level of safety that Alaris, with its concentrated and equity-like risks, cannot match. While GBDC's total return potential may be lower than Alaris's, its path to generating returns is far more predictable and less volatile. For an investor prioritizing stable income and risk management, GBDC is the clear winner.

GBDC's business moat is derived from the scale, reputation, and relationships of its manager, Golub Capital. With over $60 billion in assets under management, the Golub platform is a go-to lender for private equity firms, ensuring a steady flow of high-quality, sponsor-backed deal opportunities. This is a significant competitive advantage. The focus on sponsor-backed deals means its portfolio companies are typically well-vetted and supported by sophisticated owners. Alaris operates in a different world, often partnering with founder-led businesses, which has its own merits but lacks the institutional support structure inherent in GBDC's portfolio. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Golub Capital BDC due to the immense origination power and credibility of its external manager.

GBDC's financial profile is a picture of stability. Its revenue is almost entirely composed of predictable interest income from a floating-rate loan book, making it a direct beneficiary of higher interest rates. Its profitability, measured by Net Investment Income (NII) per share, has been remarkably stable, consistently covering its dividend. The company maintains a conservative leverage profile, an investment-grade credit rating, and a strong liquidity position. In contrast, Alaris’s cash flows are lumpier and subject to the performance of a few key partners. GBDC’s non-accrual rate is consistently among the lowest in the industry, reflecting its strong underwriting. Overall Financials Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its predictable earnings, strong dividend coverage, and fortress balance sheet.

Looking at past performance, GBDC has been a model of consistency. While its total shareholder return may not have shot the lights out, it has delivered steady, low-volatility returns with a focus on preserving its Net Asset Value (NAV). Its NAV per share has been one of the most stable in the BDC sector, a stark contrast to the volatility Alaris's book value has experienced due to investment write-downs. GBDC’s risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) are excellent. Investors in GBDC have experienced a much smoother ride than investors in Alaris, with predictable quarterly dividends and minimal surprises. Overall Past Performance Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its superior capital preservation and low-volatility returns.

GBDC's future growth is tied to the continued expansion of the private credit market and the deal flow from its sponsor relationships. While it may not grow as quickly as more aggressive players, its growth is built on a solid foundation. The company has a strong pipeline of opportunities and the ability to selectively choose the most attractive, lowest-risk deals. The stability of its model makes it a reliable partner for sponsors, ensuring its relevance. Alaris's growth is less predictable and more opportunistic. GBDC’s path is one of steady, incremental expansion. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Golub Capital BDC for its sustainable and predictable growth trajectory.

Valuation-wise, GBDC presents an interesting case. It has historically traded at a discount to its NAV, partly due to its external management structure and its focus on lower-yielding, safer loans. Recently, as the market has prioritized safety, that discount has narrowed or even flipped to a small premium. It often trades at a lower valuation than top-tier internal managers like MAIN, but with a higher valuation than riskier BDCs. Alaris's valuation is driven by its high dividend yield, which compensates for risk. GBDC often offers a better risk-adjusted value, providing a safe ~9% yield at a reasonable price-to-book multiple, making it an attractive proposition for conservative income investors. Better Value Today: Golub Capital BDC, as it offers exceptional safety and stability at a valuation that does not command the steep premium of some peers.
FS KKR Capital Corp.
FSK • NYSE MAIN MARKET
FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) is one of the largest Business Development Companies, externally managed by a partnership between FS Investments and KKR, a global investment giant. FSK's strategy involves originating large, complex credit solutions for upper middle-market companies, leveraging the immense scale, sourcing capabilities, and intellectual capital of KKR. After a series of mergers and a significant portfolio rotation, FSK has been working to reposition itself as a higher-quality lender. Its comparison to Alaris highlights the difference between a massive, institutional-scale credit platform undergoing a turnaround and a smaller, niche equity player with a concentrated portfolio.

Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust over FS KKR Capital Corp. This is a closer call, but Alaris edges out FSK due to its simpler, more focused business model and a clearer path to generating its target returns, despite its higher concentration risk. FSK's key weakness has been its historical credit performance and a legacy portfolio that has resulted in significant NAV erosion over the years. While the KKR partnership has brought immense resources and an improved outlook, the company still trades at a persistent, large discount to NAV, reflecting market skepticism. Alaris, for all its faults, has a straightforward model: partner with good businesses and collect cash. FSK's complexity, history of underperformance, and the drag from its external management fees make it a less compelling proposition, even with its diversification benefits.

FSK's business model and moat are theoretically massive, leveraging the KKR brand, which is a global powerhouse in private equity and credit. This gives FSK access to proprietary deal flow and the ability to structure and lead very large financing packages. However, this potential has not always translated into superior shareholder returns. The moat is somewhat diluted by its historical performance issues and a high external management fee structure that creates a drag on returns. Alaris has a smaller, but perhaps more effective, moat in its niche of providing non-control partnership capital, where it has built a solid reputation. Overall Business & Moat Winner: FS KKR Capital Corp. on paper due to the KKR affiliation, but with the major caveat that its execution has been inconsistent.

Financially, FSK's profile is a mixed bag. Its large, floating-rate portfolio generates significant interest income, and its Net Investment Income has generally covered its high dividend yield. However, the quality of that income has been a concern, with a higher-than-average non-accrual rate at times and a history of realized losses that have eaten into its NAV. The company has taken steps to de-risk its portfolio, but the process is ongoing. Alaris's financials are more volatile due to concentration, but its model of collecting steady preferred distributions can be more resilient than a portfolio of troubled loans. FSK's leverage is comparable to peers, but the quality of the underlying assets has been the key issue. Overall Financials Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust, narrowly, because its cash flow stream from performing partners is arguably of higher quality than FSK's earnings, which have been offset by credit issues.

Past performance is a clear weak spot for FSK. Over the last five years, FSK has been a significant underperformer in the BDC space, delivering a negative total shareholder return and substantial NAV per share erosion. The stock has been a 'value trap' for years—cheap for a reason. While recent performance has improved under KKR's more direct oversight, the long-term track record is poor. Alaris has also had its struggles, including a dividend cut, but its long-term performance has not been as dilutive to shareholder capital as FSK's has been. Overall Past Performance Winner: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust by default, as FSK's track record is among the weakest of the large BDCs.

FSK's future growth outlook has improved significantly with the full weight of the KKR platform behind it. The strategy is to rotate out of legacy, lower-quality assets into more conservatively underwritten, KKR-sourced deals. If successful, this turnaround could unlock significant value. This represents a potential catalyst that Alaris lacks. However, it is an execution-dependent story. Alaris's growth is more modest and predictable, based on deploying its capital into a few new partnerships each year. The upside is arguably higher with FSK if the turnaround works, but the risk of continued mediocrity is also high. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: FS KKR Capital Corp. based purely on the potential for a successful, KKR-led turnaround.

Valuation is FSK's main attraction. It consistently trades at one of the largest discounts to NAV in the BDC sector, often in the 0.75x - 0.85x range. This implies that investors can buy its portfolio of loans for 75 to 85 cents on the dollar. Its dividend yield is consequently one of the highest available, often exceeding 12%. The core debate is whether this discount is a fair reflection of its risks or a compelling value opportunity. Alaris also offers a high yield but trades closer to its book value. For deep value, contrarian investors, FSK is tempting. However, the discount exists for a reason. Better Value Today: Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust, because its high yield comes from a more transparent, albeit concentrated, model, whereas FSK's high yield is accompanied by a history of capital destruction that makes its 'cheap' valuation a significant risk.
Onex Corporation
ONEX.TO • TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE
Onex Corporation (ONEX.TO) is a leading Canadian alternative asset manager, making it a domestic peer for Alaris, though their business models are fundamentally different. Onex operates two main segments: its Investing segment, where it invests its own substantial balance sheet capital into private equity, credit, and other strategies ('Invested Capital'), and its Asset Management segment, where it manages capital on behalf of third-party institutional clients and earns management and performance fees ('Fee-Generating AUM'). This makes Onex a hybrid of an investment holding company and a traditional asset manager, contrasting with Alaris’s direct, yield-focused investment model.

Winner: Onex Corporation over Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. Onex wins this comparison based on its much larger scale, diversified business model, and superior long-term potential for capital appreciation. Onex's key strength lies in its dual engine for value creation: direct investment returns from its large, permanent capital base and the scalable, high-margin fee revenue from its growing asset management platform. This diversification provides multiple ways to win and offers more resilience than Alaris’s model, which is entirely dependent on the cash flows from a small number of direct investments. While Alaris provides a higher current dividend yield, Onex offers a more compelling total return proposition through the long-term compounding of its book value and fee-generating assets.

Onex's business and moat are rooted in its 40-year history and its stellar brand in the private equity world. It is one of Canada's most respected investors, giving it a powerful advantage in sourcing deals and attracting third-party capital. Its large, permanent capital base (~$8 billion of its own capital invested) allows it to be a long-term, patient investor and align its interests with its clients. This is a significant structural advantage. Alaris has built a strong reputation in its specific niche, but it operates on a much smaller scale and lacks Onex's institutional clout and diversified revenue streams. Overall Business & Moat Winner: Onex Corporation due to its premier brand, diversified model, and large permanent capital base.

From a financial perspective, Onex's results are lumpier than a pure-play credit firm but more diversified than Alaris's. Its revenue comes from investment gains (which are volatile), management fees (stable), and performance fees (volatile but high-margin). The key metric for Onex is the growth in its Net Asset Value (NAV) per share over time, which reflects the performance of its invested capital. This has compounded at an attractive rate over decades. Its balance sheet is very strong, with a large cash position and modest leverage. Alaris’s financials are all about generating distributable cash. While its revenue is more predictable in the short term, Onex's model is geared for greater long-term value creation. Overall Financials Winner: Onex Corporation for its stronger balance sheet and greater long-term compounding potential.

Onex's long-term past performance has been excellent, having compounded its capital at a rate significantly outperforming public market benchmarks for decades. However, its performance over the last five years has been more muted as its large private equity funds have navigated a more challenging environment, causing its stock to underperform. Alaris’s performance has also been volatile. Onex's historical track record of creating value through multiple economic cycles is more proven than Alaris's. Despite recent headwinds, Onex’s long-term ability to compound capital is superior. Overall Past Performance Winner: Onex Corporation based on its multi-decade record of value creation.

Future growth for Onex is driven by its ability to scale its asset management platforms, particularly in private credit and wealth management, and the performance of its private equity funds. The company is actively focused on growing its fee-generating AUM, which would make its earnings more stable and command a higher valuation multiple from the market. This represents a significant potential catalyst. Alaris's growth is more linear, tied to the amount of capital it can deploy into new partnerships. Onex has more levers to pull for future growth. Overall Growth Outlook Winner: Onex Corporation due to the scalability of its asset management business.

Valuation is a key part of the investment thesis for Onex. The stock frequently trades at a significant discount to its underlying Net Asset Value per share, sometimes as low as 50-60%. This means an investor can buy into its portfolio of private companies and its asset management business for substantially less than their intrinsic value. This discount represents a major margin of safety. Alaris is valued primarily on its dividend yield. While Onex's dividend yield is much lower (~1.5%), its total return potential from closing the NAV gap is substantial. Better Value Today: Onex Corporation, as its profound and persistent discount to NAV offers a more compelling long-term value proposition and margin of safety than Alaris's high-yield, higher-risk model.

Detailed Analysis

Does Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?

2/5

Underwriting Track Record
Fail
The company's underwriting history is mixed, marked by both successful partnerships and several significant impairments, indicating that its risk control has not been consistently effective.
The success of Alaris's model hinges on its ability to underwrite risk in private companies. Its historical record shows mixed results. While the company has had many stable, long-term partners and several successful exits where it earned a capital gain, it has also suffered significant losses from failed partnerships. For example, impairments related to partners like 'Sandbox' and 'Kimbel' in past years resulted in substantial write-downs and forced reductions in Alaris's own dividend. These events demonstrate that its underwriting process is not infallible and that its portfolio is susceptible to severe, permanent capital loss. While the company aims for a Fair Value/Cost ratio above 1.0, this has fluctuated, and realized losses have periodically erased gains from other parts of the portfolio. This inconsistent track record suggests the moat derived from its underwriting expertise is narrower than ideal.
Permanent Capital Advantage
Pass
The company's greatest strategic advantage is its permanent capital base from being a public entity, enabling it to be a patient, long-term investor without the pressure of forced exits.
Unlike traditional private equity funds that have a fixed lifespan (typically 7-10 years) and must eventually sell their investments to return capital to investors, Alaris is a publicly-traded trust. This structure provides it with 'permanent capital'—money raised from public unitholders that does not have a redemption date. This is a critical competitive advantage in its niche. It allows Alaris to be a true long-term partner, holding investments indefinitely as long as they perform well. This patience is highly attractive to private business owners and allows Alaris to avoid selling good assets at bad times simply because a fund is nearing its end. The stability of its funding base, which also includes a corporate credit facility, underpins its entire business model and value proposition to potential partners.
Fee Structure Alignment
Pass
With an internally managed structure and no external performance fees, Alaris's management interests are strongly aligned with unitholders, a clear advantage over many externally managed peers.
Alaris operates as an internally managed company, not an external fund manager. This means it does not charge management or incentive fees based on assets under management (AUM) or performance, which is a common practice in the specialty finance industry. Its costs are its own corporate operating expenses (G&A), which are more transparent and generally lower than the fee loads of competitors. This structure aligns management's focus with maximizing long-term per-unit profitability rather than simply growing AUM. Furthermore, insider ownership is meaningful, with executives and directors holding a significant stake in the company. This ensures that management has 'skin in the game,' directly sharing in the successes and failures alongside retail investors. This alignment is a distinct and powerful advantage, as it avoids the potential conflicts of interest inherent in the external manager model.
Portfolio Diversification
Fail
The portfolio is poorly diversified, with a high concentration in its top investments, making unitholder returns highly vulnerable to the failure of a single partner company.
Despite investing across various industries, Alaris's portfolio is highly concentrated. The company typically holds investments in fewer than 30 companies. As of its Q3 2023 reporting, its top 10 partners represented over 70% of its revenue, which is substantially more concentrated than a typical diversified investment vehicle like a BDC or an equity ETF. The largest single partner often contributes more than 10% of total revenue. This lack of diversification is the single most significant risk in Alaris's business model. While a successful large investment can drive strong returns, a failure can be catastrophic for the trust's overall revenue and unit price. This 'all our eggs in a few baskets' approach means investors are heavily exposed to idiosyncratic risks specific to each partner company, a risk that cannot be diversified away within the trust itself.
Contracted Cash Flow Base
Fail
Alaris's revenues are based on contractual distributions from its partners, but these payments are not guaranteed and can be cut if a partner's business deteriorates, making cash flow less visible than for businesses with ironclad contracts.
Alaris's revenue stream is derived from preferred distributions contractually agreed upon with its portfolio companies. While this appears predictable, the cash flow visibility is weaker than that of companies with guaranteed or regulated revenue. The payments are contingent on the ongoing financial health and performance of the underlying private businesses. If a partner faces operational challenges or an economic downturn, it can (and sometimes must) suspend these distributions to preserve cash. Alaris has experienced this multiple times in its history, leading to sudden drops in revenue. For instance, as of late 2023, the company's largest partner, 'PF,' accounted for approximately 13% of revenue, highlighting the concentration risk. While these are legally binding contracts, they are not equivalent to a bond payment from a blue-chip company; the counterparty risk is significantly higher. Therefore, the contractual base provides a forecast but not a guarantee.

How Strong Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Financial Statements?

2/5

Leverage and Interest Cover
Fail
While the company's overall debt-to-equity ratio remains low, its total debt has more than doubled in the last year to fund cash flow shortfalls, a worrying trend.
Alaris's debt profile has changed materially for the worse. Total debt surged from $64.64M at the end of fiscal 2024 to $151.98M by Q3 2025. This increase was not for strategic growth but was primarily to plug the cash flow deficit seen in Q2, where the company took on $87.8M in net new debt. Although its debt-to-equity ratio remains low at 0.13 and its debt-to-EBITDA ratio is a manageable 1.04, the speed and reason for this debt accumulation are major red flags. Using leverage to fund operations and shareholder returns, rather than productive investments, signals underlying financial stress.
Cash Flow and Coverage
Fail
Cash flow is highly volatile and has recently been insufficient to consistently cover its substantial dividend, creating a significant risk for income investors.
Alaris's ability to cover its distributions with internally generated cash is poor. In fiscal year 2024, its free cash flow (FCF) of $59.37M did not fully cover the $61.92M paid in dividends. The situation deteriorated significantly in Q2 2025, which saw a negative FCF of -$69.16M, meaning operations consumed cash while the company still paid out $15.5M in dividends. Although FCF recovered to $19.2M in Q3 2025 and covered that quarter's $15.47M dividend, this one positive quarter does not offset the clear pattern of inconsistent and insufficient cash generation. With a very low cash balance of $5.99M, the company has no buffer to sustain payouts during weak periods without resorting to debt.
Operating Margin Discipline
Pass
The company reports exceptionally high operating margins, but these are distorted by volatile non-cash revenue items, making them an unreliable indicator of core operational efficiency.
On paper, Alaris demonstrates strong margin discipline, with operating margins consistently above 80% (93.32% in Q3 2025). This is largely due to its business model, where revenue from investments greatly outweighs the relatively small and stable corporate operating expenses, which were just $5.01M in the latest quarter. Selling, General & Administrative costs are also modest. However, the 'revenue' line item is extremely volatile as it includes non-cash and unrealized gains or losses from investments and currency movements. Therefore, while the company's fixed costs appear well-controlled, the headline operating margin is not a reliable measure of its underlying operational health due to the poor quality of the revenue figure.
Realized vs Unrealized Earnings
Fail
A significant portion of reported net income comes from unrealized, non-cash items like currency fluctuations, making earnings quality poor and unreliable for assessing performance.
Alaris's earnings mix is heavily skewed towards unrealized, non-cash items, which masks its true cash-generating ability. In fiscal 2024, net income was $234.42M, but this was inflated by an $80.82M currency gain and other non-cash adjustments; actual cash from operations was only $59.37M. This pattern is consistent in recent quarters: Q2 2025's net loss was driven by a -$44.79M currency loss, while Q3 2025's profit was boosted by an $18.52M currency gain. This reliance on mark-to-market accounting and foreign exchange movements means reported earnings are not a trustworthy source for judging the company's ability to generate the cash required to sustain its dividend.
NAV Transparency
Pass
As a specialty capital provider and not a fund, Net Asset Value (NAV) is not a primary metric; however, its tangible book value per share has remained stable, which is a positive sign.
This factor, focused on NAV, is not perfectly applicable to Alaris's business structure. We can use Tangible Book Value (TBV) per share as a proxy for the underlying value of its assets. As of Q3 2025, its TBV per share stood at $25.17, which is slightly higher than the $24.15 reported at the end of fiscal 2024. This stability suggests that the value of its investment portfolio has not deteriorated despite market volatility. However, the financial statements do not provide detailed transparency into the valuation methods or the breakdown of assets (e.g., Level 3 assets), which remains a blind spot for investors. Given the stability of the book value, this factor passes, but with reservations about transparency.

How Has Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Performed Historically?

3/5

AUM and Deployment Trend
Pass
While specific AUM data is not provided, the company's history of deploying capital into long-term investments has successfully fueled volatile but ultimately profitable returns.
As a specialty capital provider, Alaris's core activity is deploying capital. This is reflected in its balance sheet, where 'Long Term Investments' grew from $880.5 million in 2020 to $1.185 billion in 2024. The cash flow statement also shows significant investment activity, such as $238 million invested in securities in 2021. This deployment is the engine for the company's revenue, which comes from distributions and gains on these investments. The lumpy nature of revenue suggests that capital deployment and, more importantly, the realization of profits from those investments, are episodic rather than smooth. The model has proven effective at generating high profits, but the lack of consistent year-over-year growth in revenue highlights the unpredictable nature of its success.
Revenue and EPS History
Fail
The company's history is defined by extremely volatile revenue and earnings, with massive swings from one year to the next that make it impossible to identify a consistent growth trend.
A review of Alaris's past performance shows anything but stable growth. Revenue growth figures are erratic: +210% in 2021, -6% in 2022, +22% in 2023, and -36% in 2024. Earnings per share (EPS) follows a similarly unpredictable path. This is a direct result of the company's business model, which relies on the performance of its partners and the timing of investment exits. While the company can be highly profitable, the lack of predictability and consistency is a significant historical weakness. For an investor looking for a steady growth story, Alaris's record would be a major concern.
TSR and Drawdowns
Fail
Reflecting its volatile business, the stock has delivered positive long-term returns but with higher-than-average risk and significant price swings along the way.
The stock's performance history mirrors the choppiness of its financial results. With a beta of 1.39, the stock has historically been about 39% more volatile than the overall market. While total shareholder returns have been positive in most of the last five years, they have also included periods of significant underperformance, such as a -23.58% return in 2021. This indicates that while investors may be rewarded over the long run, especially with the high dividend, they must be prepared to endure considerable volatility and potential drawdowns. This risk profile is not suitable for all investors.
Return on Equity Trend
Pass
The company has generated strong but volatile returns on equity, averaging over `15%` in the last four years, indicating it has been highly effective at converting its capital into profits.
Alaris has demonstrated strong profitability in recent years. Its Return on Equity (ROE) was impressive at 20.7% in 2021, 15.5% in 2022, 14.9% in 2023, and 22.7% in 2024. These figures are a significant improvement from the 3.4% recorded in 2020 and suggest a durable ability to earn high returns in its niche market. This level of return indicates that management has been efficient in using shareholder capital to generate profits. However, the volatility in ROE reflects the underlying lumpiness of the company's earnings.
Dividend and Buyback History
Pass
Alaris has a strong track record of paying a reliable and gradually increasing dividend, though investors have faced share dilution over the past five years.
The company's commitment to its dividend is a key feature of its history. Dividend per share has grown from $1.28 in 2021 to $1.36 in 2024, providing a stable income stream for investors. The dividend has generally been covered by free cash flow, although coverage was very tight in FY2024, with $59 million in FCF against $62 million in dividends paid. The primary drawback has been shareholder dilution. The total number of shares outstanding increased from 39 million in 2020 to 45 million by the end of 2023, before a slight reduction in 2024. While the dividend history is a clear positive, the dilutive share issuances are a historical weakness.

What Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Future Growth Prospects?

3/5

Contract Backlog Growth
Fail
While revenues are contractual, the 'backlog' of future distributions is unreliable due to a history of partner underperformance leading to payment deferrals and write-downs, indicating poor cash flow visibility.
Alaris's revenue is derived from contractually agreed-upon preferred distributions from its partners. However, this backlog is not as secure as it appears. The company has a track record of partners facing financial distress, resulting in the suspension or reduction of these payments. This makes the future revenue stream less predictable than that of a company with ironclad, non-cancellable contracts with high-credit-quality customers. The lack of true long-term visibility and the portfolio's high concentration mean that the failure of a single large partner can materially impact the entire backlog overnight. This recurring issue of impairments and renegotiated terms demonstrates a fundamental weakness in the quality and durability of the contracted cash flows.
Funding Cost and Spread
Pass
The company maintains a strong and profitable spread between its high-yielding investments and its relatively low, predominantly fixed-rate cost of debt.
Alaris's business model is built on the spread between its asset yield and its funding cost, which remains robust. The weighted average yield on its portfolio is consistently high, often in the 14% range. This is funded by a mix of public equity and corporate debt. The company's primary credit facility often has a significant portion fixed or hedged, insulating its earnings from the full impact of rising interest rates. This results in a wide and attractive net investment spread, which is the primary driver of earnings. While a higher rate environment increases borrowing costs, the very high yield on Alaris's assets provides a substantial buffer, ensuring continued profitability.
Fundraising Momentum
Pass
This factor is not directly applicable; however, Alaris's permanent capital structure as a public entity provides a stable and perpetual source of funding for growth, which is a key strategic advantage.
Alaris does not raise capital through traditional fundraising or new fund vehicles like an asset manager. Instead, it sources growth capital from three main areas: public equity markets by issuing new units, its corporate credit facility, and cash recycled from partner redemptions. This 'permanent capital' structure is a significant advantage, as it does not have to return money to investors and can hold investments indefinitely. This provides a stable, long-term capital base that allows it to execute its patient investment strategy without the pressure of a fixed fund life. This reliable and flexible access to capital is a core strength supporting its future growth.
Deployment Pipeline
Pass
Alaris maintains a healthy deployment pipeline and has sufficient access to capital through its credit facility and partner redemptions to fund near-term growth.
Future growth is contingent on deploying new capital, and Alaris has demonstrated a consistent ability to do so. The company typically provides annual deployment guidance, often in the range of $150 million to $250 million, and has a history of meeting or exceeding these targets. Its 'dry powder' comes from its corporate credit facility, which provides several hundred million in available capital, as well as cash generated from the redemption of previous investments. This access to liquidity allows the company to act on new partnership opportunities as they arise, providing a clear path to growing its revenue-generating asset base. The company's ability to continually source and fund new deals is a core strength.
M&A and Asset Rotation
Fail
The company's history of asset rotation is inconsistent, with successful exits and capital gains being periodically offset by underperforming investments that are redeemed at or below cost.
Asset rotation, or 'redemptions' in Alaris's terms, is a key component of its capital allocation strategy, freeing up capital for new investments. However, the track record is mixed. While Alaris has achieved several successful exits that generated attractive internal rates of return (IRR) and capital gains, it has also had to manage numerous underperforming partners. In these cases, a redemption may occur at or below the initial investment cost, resulting in no gain or even a realized loss. This inconsistency in generating profitable exits prevents asset rotation from being a reliable and accretive driver of growth, making it a source of lumpiness and risk rather than a clear strength.

Is Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Fairly Valued?

4/5

NAV/Book Discount Check
Pass
The stock trades at a significant discount to its net asset value, with a Price-to-Book ratio of 0.86 against a record-high book value per share of C$25.10.
This is one of the strongest arguments for Alaris being undervalued. The company recently reported a record Net Book Value per unit of C$25.10. With the stock trading at C$21.60, this represents a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 0.86. In simple terms, this means an investor can buy a claim on the company's assets for just 86 cents on the dollar. For a company whose entire business is owning a portfolio of financial assets, this discount is a powerful valuation signal. While a discount may be warranted due to concerns about the quality or future performance of those private assets, the current 14% discount to NAV provides a substantial margin of safety for investors, making this a clear pass.
Earnings Multiple Check
Pass
The stock's current normalized P/E ratio of 6.87 is substantially below its ten-year historical average of 16.99, indicating it is cheap relative to its own past.
Alaris currently trades at a normalized Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiple of 6.87. This is significantly lower than its 10-year historical average P/E of 16.99, suggesting the stock is inexpensive compared to its own history. However, this comes with a major caveat highlighted in previous analyses: the quality of Alaris's earnings is poor. Net income is often distorted by large, unrealized, non-cash items like currency gains or losses, making the "E" in the P/E ratio an unreliable indicator of true performance. Despite this, the sheer size of the discount to its historical average is noteworthy. It signals that market sentiment is currently very low, which could provide an opportunity if the company's underlying performance stabilizes. Therefore, this factor passes, but with reservations about the quality of the earnings metric.
Yield and Growth Support
Fail
The high forward dividend yield of over 6.8% is attractive, but it is not reliably supported by the company's volatile and recently negative free cash flow.
The company's forward dividend yield of approximately 6.85% is compelling for income-seeking investors. However, this payout is on shaky ground. The prior financial analysis highlighted that free cash flow (FCF) is extremely volatile and has recently been insufficient to cover dividend payments, forcing the company to take on debt to fund shareholder returns. For instance, TTM FCF per share was negative C$-0.49 as of September 2025, while the company continues to pay a substantial dividend. While the payout ratio based on volatile accounting earnings appears low (38.42%), the cash flow coverage is poor. A high yield is only valuable if it is sustainable, and the underlying cash generation at Alaris does not consistently support the current distribution level, making this a failing factor.
Price to Distributable Earnings
Pass
While official Distributable Earnings are not available, using normalized Free Cash Flow as a proxy, the Price-to-FCF ratio appears reasonable, though the underlying cash flow is highly inconsistent.
This factor is not perfectly applicable as Alaris does not consistently report "Distributable Earnings" (DE) as a key metric in the way many income trusts do. We must use Free Cash Flow (FCF) per share as the closest proxy for cash available to be returned to shareholders. As established, FCF is extremely volatile, swinging from deeply negative to positive quarter-over-quarter. For the three months ended September 2025, FCF per share was C$0.39. Annualizing this would be difficult and misleading. However, using the more stable FY2024 FCF of C$59.4M, the FCF per share was ~C$1.30. This gives a Price-to-Normalized-FCF ratio of ~16.6x (21.60 / 1.30), which is not excessively high. Given the difficulty in measurement but the reasonable ratio against a normalized figure, this factor is rated a pass, with the strong caution that FCF consistency is the primary business risk.
Leverage-Adjusted Multiple
Pass
Despite a recent increase in debt to cover cash shortfalls, the company's overall leverage remains low, with a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 0.13 and manageable debt service.
While the FinancialStatementAnalysis correctly flagged a worrisome trend of rising debt to fund cash shortfalls, the company's overall leverage remains at a conservative level. Key metrics like Net Debt/EBITDA and the Debt-to-Equity ratio of 0.13 are low for a financial services company. This low leverage provides a crucial buffer and financial flexibility. An EV/EBITDA multiple, which accounts for debt, would also likely appear low given the company's high reported EBITDA. Although the reason for the recent debt increase is a red flag, the absolute level of leverage does not yet pose a threat to the company's solvency. This structural strength means the stock's cheap valuation is not a "value trap" caused by excessive debt, allowing this factor to pass.

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD.UN)

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

Financial Statement Analysis

Past Performance

Future Growth

Fair Value

Future Risks

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Warren Buffett

Charlie Munger

Bill Ackman

Competition

Ares Capital Corporation

Main Street Capital Corporation

Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.

Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

FS KKR Capital Corp.

Onex Corporation

Top Similar Companies

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust PLC

Kama Holdings Limited

Detailed Analysis

Does Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?

Underwriting Track Record

Permanent Capital Advantage

Fee Structure Alignment

Portfolio Diversification

Contracted Cash Flow Base

How Strong Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Financial Statements?

Leverage and Interest Cover

Cash Flow and Coverage

Operating Margin Discipline

Realized vs Unrealized Earnings

NAV Transparency

How Has Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Performed Historically?

AUM and Deployment Trend

Revenue and EPS History

TSR and Drawdowns

Return on Equity Trend

Dividend and Buyback History

What Are Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust's Future Growth Prospects?

Contract Backlog Growth

Funding Cost and Spread

Fundraising Momentum

Deployment Pipeline

M&A and Asset Rotation

Is Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Fairly Valued?

NAV/Book Discount Check

Earnings Multiple Check

Yield and Growth Support

Price to Distributable Earnings

Leverage-Adjusted Multiple

Detailed Future Risks

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD.UN)

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

Financial Statement Analysis

Past Performance

Future Growth

Fair Value

Future Risks

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Warren Buffett

Charlie Munger

Bill Ackman

Competition

Ares Capital Corporation

Main Street Capital Corporation

Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.

Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

FS KKR Capital Corp.

Onex Corporation

Top Similar Companies

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation

Octopus Renewables Infrastructure Trust PLC

Kama Holdings Limited

Detailed Analysis

Does Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?